Laserfiche WebLink
1 He indicated that city uses color coded plastic baskets into which the <br />' residents sort out their bottles, cans, and newspapers and he thought <br />s were also specifically identified as to address. He reported that the <br />4 financial incentive to generate less recyclable waste was also built <br />5 into that system because the residents were given a $6.60 quarterly <br />6 credit on their billing for recycling at least three times per quarter, <br />7 which he said amounts to over $26.00 a year. The resident said his <br />8 greatest concern was with all the proceeds going only to the City's <br />9 Beautification Fund and nothing returned to the residents who are paying <br />10 for the pick up who he knew from his own garbage bills had experienced <br />11 a five fold raise in what they paid since he moved to St. Anthony. <br />12 Mr. Webber said he thought giving a financial incentive to the residents <br />13 would serve as a greater encouragement for them to recycle and not <br />14 ignore the system. The resident then indicated he thought Woodlake's <br />15 willingness to pickup next to his garage was aesthetically better for <br />16 the community as a whole because under the present system of irregular <br />17 pick up by other vendors, there are always empty cans and covers laying <br />18 out in the street on windy days. He said he didn't think he should have <br />19 to pay more for that same service under the new program. <br />20 When Mr. Webber reported talking to Woodlake and finding out that the <br />21 company was quite disturbed that they hadn't been solicited to provide <br />22 input or submit a bid to do the City's hauling, Councilmember Enrooth <br />23 told him that company had been solicited through their parent company, <br />24 BFI, at the only address the City had on their license, and they had <br />25 at first declined to participate; had second thoughts about it later, <br />26 and had brought in the documentation that they had been notified with <br />them when they came into the City Offices the previous day to request <br />z8 they be considered as the City's recycler. The Councilmember also <br />29 indicated financial incentives to the recycling customers had also been <br />30 one of the major Task Force recommendations to the Council. <br />31 Rose Murphy, 2601 - 36th Avenue N.E. said she didn't see any reason for <br />32 having to pay three months in advance for garbage services when other <br />33 services like heat and electricity only billed her after she had gotten <br />34 the service. The resident said she was especially irritated to have <br />35 Waste Management bill in advance for services she had never received <br />36 because she had been out of town on vacation. She said Christens, the <br />37 company which had preceded Waste Management, had always given her a <br />38 discount for any periods when she didn't require their services. <br />39 Mayor Sundland reported he had gotten the same type of complaint about <br />40 garbage cans flying around the street and having to haul their garbage <br />41 cans down to the street from other City residents, Chet and Ruth Nelson, <br />42 as had been expressed by Mr. Webber. The resident's response to that <br />43 was that although Woodlake wouldn't pick up tree branches or materials <br />44 of that sort from his garage, they did provide that service for garbage <br />45 cans which were more apt to be flying around the street if left at the <br />46 curb. Mr. Webber added that his mother only paid $105.66 to have her <br />47 garbage and recyclables hauled in St. Louis Park, while he was paying <br />48 Woodlake $144.00 a year to have all his garbage hauled now and <br />