My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 11221988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1988
>
CC MINUTES 11221988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 9:12:34 AM
Creation date
8/20/2014 7:05:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
11/22/1988
Meeting Type
Regular
Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 which the Commission had not been able to get answers during the <br />hearing were cleared up. <br />3 Mr. Childs indicated the City Ordinance would not prevent the store from <br />4 having the lights in the window, but only said they should not be <br />5 flashing. (He said they are not at this time.) The City Manager <br />6 reported the Public Works Director was waiting to hear the Council's <br />7 direction that evening before proceeding with the inspection and <br />8 issuance of a permit for the expansion. Councilmember Makowske said she <br />9 personally had no problem with Mr. Belisle keeping the lights in the <br />10 window as long as they aren't flashing and are turned off when the store <br />11 is closed. Councilmember Enrooth indicated he was still concerned that <br />12 this was just another situation where a store owner takes actions with <br />13 complete disregard for the City's codes and ordinances and then pleads <br />14 ignorance and is allowed to continue to be in non-compliance. <br />15 Mr. Belisle stated that there had been communication problems with the <br />16 City regarding the lights, reiterating that he had received no response <br />17 to the letter his franchise lawyer had sent to the City in 1984 <br />18 insisting that the lights should be considered "historical symbols". <br />19 He said he had thought the matter was a dead issue when he had gotten <br />20 no response from the City. <br />21 Mr. Childs recalled that the Planning Commission had considered the <br />22 lawyer's letter and refused to accept the historical symbol concept it <br />23 proposed. The City Manager said although he had no copy of a letter <br />94 informing Mr. Belisle of that ruling, he thought he had called the <br />store owner. Since that had all happened in 1984, he couldn't be <br />z6 absolutely certain what action had been taken so long ago. <br />27 When Councilmember Ranallo expressed some concerns about the extent of <br />28 electrical work the store owner and the other Video Update employees had <br />29 done in the new space, Mr. Belisle said all they had basically done was <br />30 to lift the electrical junction boxes up into the suspended ceiling <br />31 without disconnecting the conduit at all. Mayor Sundland indicated that <br />32 was one of the reasons he perceived it would be necessary to make the <br />33 permit extension contingent upon the Building Inspector's assurance that <br />34 the remodeling met all the necessary codes and ordinances. <br />35 Condition #4 in the original permit was not considered relative to the <br />36 permit because the stop sign it called for had been installed in the <br />37 meantime. Councilmember Marks said he shared Councilmember Enrooth's <br />38 sense of frustration with the unauthorized expansion and continuation <br />39 of .non -conforming signage in this store. He recalled experiencing the <br />40 same type of frustration during the years he served on the Planning <br />41 Commission when applicants would come in at the last minute to request <br />42 an "'immediate' variance for a project which had to be constructed <br />43 before the frost set in, etc." The Councilmember said then as now he <br />44 considered these to be cases where the owners exhibited very poor <br />45 planning but wasn't certain what other action the City could take with <br />46 this expansion already completed. Councilmember Enrooth indicated he <br />^7 would be satisfied to have the property given a thorough inspection by <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.