Laserfiche WebLink
1 Sundland commented that if he were Mr. Wirtz, he would certainly be <br />a lot happier to have the addition attached to the house rather than the <br />s rear of the lot. <br />4 Applicant Warned About What Could Happen if He Builds So Close to His <br />5 Property Line <br />6 when Marks observed that Mr. Tomas would only have 11 feet of driveway <br />7 in which to park vehicles much longer than that, Mr. Tomas indicated he <br />8 recognized that would be a problem he has to contend with because "the <br />9 City has every right to plow snow on their right-of-way." He also <br />10 indicated he perceived it might be advisable for him if he ever sold the <br />11 property, to warn the buyer that there was every chance the City crews <br />12 would be plowing the driveway in or vehicles parked in the driveway <br />13 might get hit by plowing equipment. <br />14 The applicant also told Makowske he clearly understood the extra <br />15 bedroom he was adding for his mother could never be rented out to anyone <br />16 outside the family. <br />17 Mr. Zebro indicated he was present that evening because he had gone <br />18 through a similar problem when he had added to his own garage and a <br />19 neighbor had opposed the addition because "her realtor had advised her <br />20 not to sign any papers." However, the Mayor and Building Inspector at <br />21 that time had decided to grant him the variance for the garage in spite <br />22 of that opposition. Mr. Zebro indicated that when Mr. Tomas had told <br />23 him what had happened at the hearing, he had advised the applicant to <br />: go to the council with his application for variance because he <br />z5 "personally believed that neither in his own or Mr. Tomas' case, should <br />26 one person's opinion prevent a homeowner from doing what he wants with <br />27 his own property." <br />28 Mr. Fisher told the Council he was the "neighbor who lived across the <br />29 street next to the woman who had opposed the variance." He said he was <br />30 also the neighbor "who allegedly had a car repair business in his <br />31 garage." The proponent said that was not true and explained that: <br />32 *he is an electronic engineer for a company in Chaska and has nothing <br />33 to do with cars; <br />34 *he is divorced and returned to his home only two months ago when he <br />35 had been awarded the house and custody of his two sons who had <br />36 previously lived with their mother; <br />37 *his ex-wife had let the boys do pretty much whatever they wanted to <br />38 do, including having parties when she was away, which had probably <br />39 irritated Mrs. Hogan. <br />40 In relation to the requested variance, Mr. Fisher stated he had no <br />41 problems with what Mr. Tomas proposed to do with his property because <br />42 "his cars have always been tucked away and not an eyesore for me." <br />10 <br />