My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 06281988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1988
>
CC MINUTES 06281988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 9:14:34 AM
Creation date
8/20/2014 7:09:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
6/28/1988
Meeting Type
Regular
Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />1 similar opposition from the Councilmembers during the conversations <br />2 which followed Commissioner Madden's report. <br />3 The general consensus was that the mural would do nothing to correct <br />4 existing signage problems in the center and that it would be better <br />5 to defer any action on the center until after the center owner's <br />6 representative, Joe DiSanto had met with Councilmembers and Commis - <br />7 sioners later this summer. <br />8 Councilmembers told Mr. Johnson they were not failing to recognize <br />9 the improvements which the managers had already made in the area, <br />10 including the uniform painting above the storefronts and the black - <br />11 topping of the parking lots nor the fact that better communication <br />12 between the City and the owners had resulted from changes in person - <br />13 nel in both the owners' New York representative and the Eberhardt <br />14 Company. However, the perception continued that much more had to be <br />15 done to keep the center from deteriorating to the point where it <br />16 matched the condition of the shopping area adjacent to theirs on the <br />17 southwest. <br />18 Mr. Johnson responded by saying: <br />19 *the mural which could be paid from center cash flow monies, <br />20 had only been requested as a means of dressing up the back of the <br />21 center, which was exposed to Kenzie Terrace traffic and the view <br />22 from the City fire station; <br />23 *the managers have requested the City help towards getting some <br />24 sort of financing within the 5% to 8% interest range to pay for <br />25 uniform signage which would cost from $150,000.00 to $200,000.00 and <br />26 could never be saved from the cash flows; <br />27 *it's not realistic for the City to expect the owners to put one <br />28 two million dollars into a center for which property values and/or <br />29 rents could never be expected to be raised to levels which would cover <br />30 that type of expenditure; <br />31 *the owners rather resented the fact that the City had failed <br />32 to give any sort of recognition of the money they had already spent <br />33 in the last year towards improving the center or the fact that the <br />34 type of signage had been upgraded for each new store which went into <br />35 the center in the last few years. <br />36 The response to these remarks was: <br />37 *that the City welcomed better communications with both the <br />38 owners and the Eberhardt company after so many years of getting no <br />39 response to either letters or calls; <br />40 *the Council did recognize improvements were starting to be <br />41 made but were concerned they wouldn't go any farther; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.