My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 05101988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1988
>
CC MINUTES 05101988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 9:15:13 AM
Creation date
8/20/2014 7:11:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
5/10/1988
Meeting Type
Regular
Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 Councilmember Enrooth pointed out that even if the City won all the <br />2 way to the Supreme Court on one program, determination of what's <br />3 obscene would have to be made again and again for each individual item <br />4 of the programming. <br />5 The matter was deferred to a future meeting with Councilmember <br />6 Makowske being asked to discuss the issues with other commission <br />7 cities like Little Canada at the next meeting of the Ramsey County <br />8 League of Local Governments. <br />9 St. Anthony is Only North Suburban Cable Commission City Who Doesn't <br />10 Broadcast Council Meetings <br />11 When Mr. Murphy made the above comment, Councilmember Enrooth told him <br />12 that had certainly not been a big issue with the residents who had <br />13 responded to the recent community survey. Councilmember Ranallo <br />14 indicated the lack of quality in equipment as well as programming when <br />15 combined with the absence of cable company cooperation had caused the <br />16 Council to wonder if they even wanted to be associated with such a <br />17 poorly run operation. <br />18 The Cable Commissioner acknowledged that the entire Commission <br />19 recognized that North Central had done such an unsatisfactory job when <br />20 it came to providing either equipment or staff for public access <br />21 programs and he expected that would be an issue which had to be <br />22 resolved when it came to updating the cable equipment. <br />23 Judith Petrie, 3505 - 31st Avenue N.E. , who said she was present to <br />24 discuss the Parkview transfer issue further, was asked if she would <br />25 ever watch a televised Council meeting. She said her family already <br />26 watched too much television and she wouldn't allow cable to come into <br />27 her home. However, she said there were probably residents who would <br />28 watch the meeting's telecasts and she knew a lot of the younger <br />29 generation of parents considered cable to be very beneficial. <br />30 Councilmember Ranallo told her he thought it was a lot better for <br />31 residents to have immediate interchange with Councilmembers during an <br />32 actual meeting than to watch a delayed broadcast where the Council <br />33 might have already taken actions they didn't agree with. <br />34 Mayor Sundland observed what happened related to the Parkview issue <br />35 during a recent Council meeting where residents had given the Council <br />36 the benefit of just how they felt about that particular matter. He <br />37 recalled Council meetings in the past where a large attendance of <br />38 interested persons had even changed some minds on the Council about <br />39 the issue being discussed at that meeting. <br />40 David Pricket, 3424 Croft Drive, who was also present for another <br />41 reason, indicated he would only watch a live Council meeting, but <br />42 agreed with the suggestion that agendas of future City meetings be <br />43 broadcast on Channel #16 so residents could attend the meetings where <br />44 matters on which they had a particular interest were to be acted on. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.