My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 04121988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1988
>
CC MINUTES 04121988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 9:15:18 AM
Creation date
8/20/2014 7:13:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
4/12/1988
Meeting Type
Regular
Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
l recalled canoeing down that street a couple of times when <br />he was younger; <br />3 indicated surprise that Mr. Bredemus' sons hadn't known <br />4 about those conditions before they bought the house or at <br />5 least wouldn't have been told something about them by the <br />6 seller. <br />7 Ranallo pointed to the fact that the 1988 valuation had been $1,000 <br />8 less than the purchase price, even though all other St. <br />9 Anthony properties had risen at least 2-3% since 1985; <br />10 warned that the Board of Equalization might raise the valu- <br />11 ation above $89,000. <br />12 Mr. Bredemus said he didn't want to carry the issue further but was <br />13 just interested in finding out more about how the property valuations <br />14 were established. <br />15 Council Action <br />16 Motion by Ranallo, seconded by Marks to uphold the $89,000 assessed <br />17 valuation the Hennepin County Assessors had placed on the property at <br />18 2705 St. Anthony Boulevard after an onsite inspection had been made of <br />19 the premises. <br />no Motion carried unanimously. <br />21 Schmid Home at 2800 St. Anthony Boulevard to be Reevaluated <br />22 Mrs. Alois R. Schmid of the above address appeared to protest the 9.6% <br />23 raise in valuation her property had been given in 1988 which raised her <br />24 valuation from $92,000 to $97,600. Mrs. Schmid reported she had <br />25 requested an onsite inspection of her property two years ago and the <br />26 assessor at that time had reduced the valuation to $92,000 which had <br />27 stayed the same for 1987. The homeowner indicated there had been no <br />28 improvements to her home for the last 20 years. When she had called <br />29 the Assessors Office she had been told "the big house across the <br />30 street" and several other things had caused the raise which, Mrs. <br />31 Schmid said, had not satisfied her. <br />32 Councilmember Ranallo told the assessors this was the same type of <br />33 complaint he was getting from other residents whose property values <br />34 were being raised without onsite inspections. <br />35 Mr. Salzwedel told him the real estate market went up 6% last year, so <br />36 the assessors have to adjust their schedules to reflect those changes. <br />37 He indicated that by not reflecting that raise all over the City, and <br />38 not just in the quadrant inspected last year, would tend to upset the <br />39 equalization the assessors try to maintain for the City as a whole. <br />40 Mr. Busitsky added that onsite inspections just updated and verified <br />41 data already entered into the computer which is then applied to like <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.