My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes CC 08.31.1976
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1976
>
Minutes CC 08.31.1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2015 11:57:06 AM
Creation date
1/19/2015 2:07:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/31/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page: <br />Mr. Cowan replied to some of these comments by saying that Mr. Hedlund <br />had a right under law to request a hearing on any project he proposes <br />for the use of his land as long as he meets all the requirements set by <br />law for requesting such a hearing. Mr. Rymarchick added that all ques- <br />tions of whether Mr. Heelund's proposal met the criteria for a P.U.D. <br />would have been decided if the proposal had continued to be discussed <br />during meetings of the Planning Board and the Council with input from <br />anyone who appeared tv voice an opinion. At these meetings it would also <br />have been determined whether the financial stability had been established <br />for each of the proposals included in the P.U.D. <br />Mrs. Nelson then inquired whether conditional uses will still be valid <br />instruments for land usage and Mr. Fornell told her they will be and <br />then explained the two commercial use classifications for service office <br />and commercial uses which have been established in the new zoning ordin- <br />ance. -He also discussed at length the purpose and workings of the P.U.D. <br />section of the zoning ordinance. <br />Mr. Hiebel arrived at 7:50 P.M. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:51 P.M. <br />and Mr. Bowerman announced a recess. <br />At 7:57 P.M. the Chairman opened a meeting of the Planning Board to con- <br />sider Mr. Hedlund's request for Public Hearing on the proposed Gold Tiara <br />beauty salon. Motion by Mr. Marks and seconded by Mr. Cowan to recommend <br />to the Council that a Public Hearing be set during the Board's September <br />21st meeting on Mr. Hedlund's request for rezoning of the west 187 feet <br />of Lot 10, Block 6, Mounds View Acres, to allow the existing structure on <br />that property to be remodeled to accomodate the Gold Tiara beauty salon. <br />Before voting on the motion, the following amendment was made: <br />Motion by Mr. Hiebel and seconded by Mr. Rymarchick to recommend the above <br />Public Hearing be set for the earliest possible Board meeting at which <br />all legal requirements established for such hearings have been met. <br />The amendment carried unanimously. <br />The amended motion carried unanimously. <br />Motion by Mr. Johnson and seconded by Mr. Rymarchick to adjourn the meet- <br />ing at 8:05 P.M. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Helen J. Crowe, Secretary <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.