CC MINUTES 02101976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 3 Motion carried unanimously. About a dozen residents of 29th Avenue N.E. were present for the discussion of the preliminary plans containing the geometrics of the reconstruction proposal for their street as presented by Mr. Comstock. The Engineer explained they were the final results of negotiations between the Council, T.A.P. 29th Avenue Committee members, state legislators and the Minnesota Highway Department in an effort to get an acceptable roadway which would qualify for Minnesota State Aid funds. He said he felt the 16 hour traffic survey which had been taken on the street February 4th and 5th might provide a basis for requesting that the right turn lanes insisted upon by the Highway Department might be eliminated and that the base of the roadway might be decreased somewhat causing a savings of $35,000 in construction costs. The residents present, especially those whose front yards would be cut down by the right hand turning lanes, spoke in favor of eliminating those lanes. Mr. Tom Shaeffer, Co-chairman of T.A.P. expressed his committee's appreciation of the aid that had been provided to them by the Engineer and asked that the committee be allowed to participate in the negotiations with the Highway Department for the elimination of the turning lanes. Only one resident of 29th, Leonard Toth, expressed his dissatisfaction with the revised plans saying he disliked the proposed 4 foot nodes which he felt served no useful purpose since "you can't walk in them or park a car in them" and did not feel it was the consensus of the T.A.P. committee that the road be constructed in this manner. His opinion was challenged by Mr. Stan Mirocha and Rick Wolowicz who felt the vast majority of the residents of 29th had "agreed to go along with what T.A.P. 29th did". Councilman Haik said she did not want the turning lanes to serve as an accomodation for people who use 29th Avenue as a shortcut between Silver Lake Road and Highway 8. The Manager then pointed out the City's responsibility to move traffic expeditiously through the City and reminded the Council that many of those who were being thought of as "foreigners" who use 29th were in fact residents of other sections of the City who have every right to use all the streets in the community. Mayor Miedtke added his feeling that any diversion of traffic from any one particular street would result in a heavier buildup of traffic on another City street and said that street might well be 37th Avenue where residents and parents of children who go to Wilshire School are already petitioning the Council to do something to provide greater traffic control. When Councilman Haik said she wanted the sidewalks along 29th included in the final plans for reconstructing the street, Mr. Shaeffer said he would oppose having it considered at the present time since the subject was so volatile with the residents and he feared an attempt to get a consensus at the present time might result in a delay in the start of the construction of the new roadway. The question was then raised as to whether the proposed design for the reconstruction would provide safety for bicyclists without sidewalks with Mr. Shaeffer