CC MINUTES 07131976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 4 Appearing first to speak on the subject was Minneapolis Alderman Sam Sivanich who prefaced his remarks with an expression of gratitude from the City of Minneapolis to the City of St. Anthony for the assistance which the City had given Minneapolis during that city's water crisis. He said a resolution to this effect had been recently adopted by the Minneapolis City Council. He then proceeded to enumerate the reasons he felt the self service pumps should not be combined with the grocery business since, in his opinion, such methods of dispensing gas might prove injurious to the property values of the neighborhood and the community at large especially if such an operation should prove an economic failure and the gas pumps should be abandoned. He said the fire code had been made very restrictive as it applied to self service stations becuase it was believed they might be hazardous to their clients. He said the operation would probably increase the vehicular traffic in the area and thereby result in more noise, pollution and danger to the residents. He felt the proliferation of gas pumps at that particular corner would harm the aesthetics of the neighborhood and reminded those present that a self service gas dispensing operation demands the exclusive attention of one clerk. Alderman Sivanich then told the Council that the Minneapolis City Council had just the previous Friday adopted an ordinance regulating such combination operations. He told of the litigation between the city and 7-11 stores which had resulted from self service gas tanks being installed without a permit at the 7-11 store on the corner of Broadway and Adams St. N.E. because such an operation had not been included in the Urban Development Plan for St. Anthony East. When questioned by the Mayor about the two operations on the Minneapolis side of Stinson just across the street from the site in question which constituted, in the Mayor's opinion, a blight of that intersection, the alderman said the transmission company had been threatened with revocation of its license if they did not come up with suitable proposal for up- grading their operation and there had been a constant problem with the Little Europe repair station. He also answered the Manager's queries by reporting that the diseased elm trees in the same area had been tagged for removal. Roger Sax, attorney for the Schroeder Milk Company, questioned the validity of the petition against the gas dispensing operation saying his contacts with some of those who had signed indicated that many people did not know what they were against. He also mentioned the inconsistency of those who objected to the aesthetics of the new market but ignored the unsightly appearance of the Sroga Standard Station just a short distance away whose owner was one of the most vociferous opponents of the proposal. Mr. Sroga denied he was a leader of the opposition and said his business, though it might be unsightly, provided a necessary service for the neighborhood. Jim Glockzin who will operate the combination business said he felt the disadvantages of the gas pumps had been exaggerated and felt the positioning of the new market to the rear of the property would give the motorists a better view of the intersection and therefore would be a safety factor. He said the gas operation was the only enterprise which could be economically combined with the selling of groceries to increase his business.