Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 <br />Bir. Claypool continued by stating that there was statistically <br />no basis in fact for the conjecture by the residents regarding the <br />fire hazards of a self service gas dispensing operation. He quoted <br />opinions of fire insurance underwriters that there are more fire <br />hazards possible with a service station type of gas dispensing <br />operation and said there are also more noise and small nuisances <br />inherent with such operations. He estimated the proposed project <br />would use from 30,000 to 90,000 gallons of gasoline a week which <br />would result in about 8 cars per hour using the gas pumps. The <br />gas company owner said statistics show that 90% of the people who <br />patronize facilities who combine the sale of groceries and gas are <br />middle income, with an average age of 31 which he felt disproved <br />the stereotype of young hot rodders as typical users of self <br />service gas operations. He also felt a valid concern expressed <br />by the residents was that regarding the height of the sod:iuici vapor <br />lights and he said he was willing to comply with the Council's <br />direction in this regard. The only signing for the project would <br />be on the building itself, according. to Mr. Sax, irh�:, sair'. such <br />signing would meet all City regulations. <br />More than a dozen of the residents of that area were present, <br />including John Bednarz, Kenneth Otto, Duane Fisher and Joe Sroga <br />who reiterated their objections to the gas dispensing aspects of <br />the proposal because they felt it might further deteriorate the <br />residential character of the neighborhood, pose a hazard for <br />young customers who would have to crus the ods dispensing, area to <br />reach the market and would result in an increase in tra;fic and <br />on -street parking in front of their homes. These objectir..i?s were <br />also stated in the letter from Mr. and Mrs. Otto which was dist- <br />ributed to the Council members and in a three page petition: <br />against the proposal. <br />Councilman Stauffer questioned whether there had beeYi enough walk- <br />way area provided and whether there would be proper s pervision of <br />the gas pumps if there is only one clerk/attendant on duty. <br />Mr. Lien pointed out there were no other sidewalks in the area <br />and Bir. Glockzin said he usually had two employees working in the <br />store during the day and would add another for ti, night hours if <br />necessary. <br />Councilman Haik told of expressions w` concern, from residents of <br />that entire section of the City whether the prnposed project rn.ght <br />result in a potential deterioration of the neighborhood. <br />The Mayor told a Minneapolis resident who spoke against the <br />proposal and the other residents whose homes Giem on }_i:.e Minnea- <br />polis side of Stinson Boulevard that, altheugh he appreciated <br />their concern, he felt that much of the unsightl.nes^ at that <br />intersection was on the Iiinneapolis side and more of their efforts <br />should be towards convincing the officials of f7_nneapalls to Flo <br />something to preserve the area. He also want&, it made a natter <br />of record that his conversation with riinneanoais t:ouncil.;nan Sam <br />Sivanich had been misunderstood to give the j`.npression that the <br />St. Anthony Council would not app -rove the proposal. <br />