CC MINUTES 10051976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

which is now residential. Mrs. Haik considered R3 development as an acceptable use of the land which would provide the necesaary buffer between the single family homes to the east and the heavy commercial to the west, but viewed apartments as too intense use of the lard. Councilman Sundland also favored R3 development as the best use for that property and felt certain there would be residential development on the Penrod portion of that strip as long as low intensity is main- tained along Silver Lake Road. Councilman Sauer said the Council had a responsibility to all land- owners in that area, including Gordon Hedlund. Fie suggested the Council give more consideration to the recomrnend.ations of the $4,000 Nason, N'ehrman, Chapman study, that there be a mix of residential and service office usage for the undeveloped. land. The Councilman then pointed out the example of the "beautiful buffer" between resident.-Lai. and commercial which a beauty shop in Roseville had provided. Councilman Haik then said it was the contention of the League of TrIomen Voters that, although residential development does not adversely affect commercial property, the damage to residential property can be great when commercial is developed.. She did not agree that because the potential buyers for the homes along Penrod might be knowledgeable before they buy regarding the development of the land to the west, they therefore did not require protection. Motion by Councilman Stauffer and seconded by Mayor Miedtke to rezone the west 187 feet of Lot 10, Block 6, Mounds View Acres from "Resi- dential" to "B" (limited business office use). Voting on the motion: Aye: P?iedtke, Stauffer and Sauer Nay: Haik and Sundland Motion not carried. The Mayor then suggested that the two who had dissented should work with the developer on a plan for the usage of his land. Councilman Sundland said he was willing to do this but felt Mr. Hedlund already had the listing of service office uses which were permitted under til. new zoning ordinance which Councilman Sundland would find acceptable. Councilman Haik felt it was the property owners responsibility to find a good land usage for that strip. Mr. Heibel explained the request for a new sign for Pizza Hut and when no.one appeared to provide further information, the Council followed the recommendation of the Board in the following: Motion by Councilman Sauer and seconded. by Councilman Haik to deny the signage requested for Pizza Hut, 3801 Stinson Boulevard. Motion carried unanimously. (4)