My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 12092014
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2014
>
CC PACKET 12092014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 7:04:15 AM
Creation date
3/16/2015 11:52:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
12/9/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />i:ity Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />November 25 , 2014 <br />Page 2 <br />A. Resolution 14-074; a resolution accepting an Amendment to the 2015 Street & Utility <br />Improvement Feasibility Report. <br />City Engineer Todd Hubmer re v iewed the resolution with the Council and indicated that this <br />additional item would be an amendment to the 2015 Street and U tility Improvement Feasibility <br />Report and project. <br />Councilmember Stille stated that the map references 22 properties that would be affected but <br />only 14 properties were listed for asses sment and asked for additional information . <br />City Engineer Hubmer explained that 22 properties would be affected by the project but only 14 <br />properties contribute drainage and receive benefit therefore being assessed . <br />Council member Jenson asked if any public comments had been received. <br />City Engineer Hubmer stated that three petitions were received and a neighborhood meeting was <br />held. He advised that a few adjustments had been made to the proposed project and advised that <br />another neighborhood meeting would be held in the spring. He advised that the additional item <br />would be bid as an alternate in the case that the price is too high. <br />Motion by Councilmember Roth, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to adopt Resolution 14- <br />074 ; a resolution accepting an Amendment to the 2015 Street & Utility Improvement Feasibility <br />Report. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />B. Resolution 14-075; a resolution approving the Plans and Specifications and Order <br />Advertisement for Bids for the 2015 Street & Utility Improvement project. <br />City Engineer Todd Hubmer reviewed the resolution with the Council and summarized the items <br />included in the project as proposed. He identified the project area and advised that staff has met <br />with the residents included in the project area to discuss the proposed improvements. He noted <br />that portions of the project would be bid as alternates to provide options to residents in 100 <br />percent assessment areas. He advised that staff would speak with all residents proposed for <br />assessment once the bids are received to further discuss the potential assessments. He reported a <br />proposed total project cost of $2 ,800,000 and reviewed the rates of assessment for each portion <br />of the project. He advised that staff has received some resident comments and petitions, noting <br />that staff will contin_ue to meet with residents to discuss potential assessments. He reviewed the <br />project schedule, noting that the second round of public information meetings would be held in <br />January of 2015 with the contract being awarded in February, and construction to begin in May. <br />Mayor Faust stated that it appears this will be a busy y ear cleaning up irritant issues. He stated <br />that he was pleased to see the commitment of $50,000 towards the LED lighting. <br />Councilmember Roth referenced the projected cost funding asked for additional information <br />regarding the different ra tes of as sessment for certain aspects of the project.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.