Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />10 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />March 10, 2015 <br />Page 3 <br />time or should have figured out not to build in that area. He stated the City is assessing people <br />benefiting from this but he does not benefit one iota from this, adding he was glad something is <br />being done so neighbors can have dry basements but he does not have a wet basement and this <br />does not benefit him. He asked if there was anything offered to the residents who said no to this <br />project and reiterated he does not want to pay for it, adding that his taxes are already paying for it <br />through the 65% share. <br />Ms. Sherry Stenberg, 2816 34`h Avenue NE, stated she is opposed to the drainage improvements <br />and wanted to know what else was considered. She asked if rain gardens or other ways to utilize <br />water were considered. She stated she lives on a hill and has standing water at the bottom of her <br />yard and she has landscaped it to make use of that water. She felt if the residents asking for <br />these improvements needed this project, they should get it without assessing the others, adding <br />this project would not help her at all. <br />Ms. Bobbie Ann Fredsall, 3318 Belden Drive, stated she is one of the benefitting residents. She <br />stated she bought her house in 2003 and it never occurred to her or her neighbors to the east that <br />they would have so much of a water problem. She stated they have put in thousands of dollars <br />and are still not guaranteed this will fix the problem. <br />City Engineer Hubmer advised the City looked at different alternatives for the drainage <br />improvements and one of the options was to restore an open channel flow, however, because of <br />all the fences, landscaping, trees, etc., that option is more expensive than the current option and <br />is more disruptive and the proposed option was the least expensive and least intrusive. <br />Mr. Mike Johnson, trustee of Elmwood Church, stated that during last year's project the <br />contractor parked their vehicles in the church parking lot and asked if that will happen again. <br />City Engineer Hubmer advised that City staff are working with church staff on reasonable <br />accommodations for parking of contractor vehicles during construction. <br />Mayor Faust closed the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. <br />Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve Resolution <br />15-025; a Resolution Ordering Improvements for the 2015 Street and Utility Improvements. <br />Councilmember Stille acknowledged the drainage improvements should have been done when <br />these homes were originally built and it is hard to go back and correct that. He stated the City <br />has been through this before and there needs to be a level of consistency with these projects and <br />the way that the improvements are assessed. <br />Mayor Faust stated the City has always used a 35%/65% formula for assessing. He stated the <br />City Council has previously heard the argument about being on top of a hill, but those homes are <br />contributing to the issues downstream and he wants people to have safe, dry homes. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />B. Resolution 15-026• a Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for the 2015 <br />Street and Utility Improvement Project Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, presenting. <br />