My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION 11022015
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2015
>
CC WORKSESSION 11022015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2015 4:05:42 PM
Creation date
10/27/2015 4:04:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Mark Casey <br />Refinancing of 2006 TIF Revenue Bonds – Silver Lake Village Commercial <br />October 23, 2015 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />backed solely by TIF revenue generated from the project. If revenues were not <br />sufficient to pay principal and interest on the bonds, the City was not required to levy <br />taxes to make up the shortfall. In addition, the bonds were issued with 120% debt <br />service coverage. <br /> <br />To date, the bonds have performed well. The TIF generated has always been in excess <br />of what is needed for debt service and in fact, since 2006 has generated an additional <br />$630,000 to the TIF fund that is available for use by the City. In 2014 the coverage on <br />the bonds was approximately 102% and for 2015 it is expected to be approximately <br />100%. The assessed market values of the commercial property have remained <br />unchanged for the past few years and I anticipate they won’t change for the next <br />several. Since the original bonds were issued with the assumption of a 1% inflation on <br />property valuations over the term of the bonds, I anticipate that if they are not <br />refinanced, that the TIF generated will not be adequate to pay the debt service on the <br />bonds and thus the City will need to utilize the existing TIF fund balance to make <br />payments. <br /> <br />The call date on these bonds is August 1, 2016. However, we can refinance the bonds <br />today as an advance refunding, meaning we are refunding them more than 90-days <br />prior to the call date. We have been discussing the possible refinancing with Dougherty <br />who issued the original bonds for the City/HRA. Since these bonds are not currently <br />meeting the 120% debt service requirement, they cannot be sold as revenue bonds in <br />the market today. Therefore, based upon discussions with staff, we are recommending <br />issuing them as general obligation bonds (like we did for the refinancing of the 2007 TIF <br />revenue bonds in 2014). <br /> <br />Based upon the attached bond analysis, the annual savings, inclusive of costs of <br />issuance, will be approximately $70,000 or $1,100,823 over the term of the bonds <br />(present value of $945,000 or approximately 23% of the refunded principal). More <br />importantly, if we assume the same amount of TIF that is generated today through the <br />remaining term of the bond, there will always be more TIF generated than is needed to <br />pay debt service on the bonds, thus continuing to provide additional TIF revenue for the <br />City to utilize on other projects (projected to be approximately $1.2 million). <br /> <br /> Please contact me at 651-697-8506 with any questions. <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.