PL PACKET 09282015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

We are requesting a variance to the current street side setback requirements in order to accommodate a small addition to the front of the house for the purpose of creating a new entryway as part of a larger remodeling project which includes a redesigned kitchen/dining area, master bedroom and master bath. Currently we would have to have a minimium setback, based upon the two adjoining properties of thirty four feet ten and one half inches. The proposed front addition will be six feet six inches deep by eleven feet seven inches wide and would have a new setback from the street of twenty eight feet. The proposed entryway would include a new, larger entryway, new door as well as direct access to the main living area on the second floor bypassing the current entryway. We believe this request is made in compliance with Section 152.245 for the following reasons: (C) (1): The subject matter is within the scope of the afore mentioned section. (C) (2) (a): We believe we will be using the property in a reasonable manner by redesigning the entryway, modernizing the appearance of the current house and entryway by creating a larger, more open entryway and updating the street appearance of the house. (C) (2) (b): Because the current entryway is part of an original split level design we have no other options to provide for an updated entryway but to include the front addition to allow for a new entryway door, foyer and stairway that provides direct access to the main living area of the house. This is unique to the original design of the split level entry style home. (C) (2) (c): We believe the redesigned entryway will not alter the essential character of the locality. The property will still be a single family home, as are the rest of the houses in the neighborhood. The proposed addition will only provide for a much needed redesigned front entryway and direct access to the main living area of the home. (C) (2) (d): Economic considerations alone are not the basis for the request. Because of the how the house sits on the lot the only design option that would provide for a new front entryway is to add on to the front of the house and this requires relief from the current setback requirements. (C) (3): We believe the variance is consistent with the city’s comprehensive land use plan because as mentioned before the variance will only provide relief for a redesigned front entryway. The rest of the project complies with all other city requirements with the house remaining a single family dwelling. The only other changes will be an update appearance as well as functional improvements to the interior. (C)) (4): We believe the variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning code for the reason stated in the previous paragraph. In closing we would like to state that we believe the variance, if approved will provide for a much improved entryway and will actually enhance the character of the house as well as the neighborhood. We believe our architect has provided us with a unique and creative way to update our house in a manner that meets our criteria for a more open floor plan as well as the increased functionality that we sought in a redesigned home. Thank you for considering our request and we hope you will agree with us in our reasoning and approve the variance as requested. Gordon & Becky Januszewski 14