My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HRA MINUTES 11091999
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
HRA Minutes
>
1999
>
HRA MINUTES 11091999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 10:49:26 AM
Creation date
12/16/2015 10:49:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/9/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes <br />November 9, 1999 <br />• Page 4 <br />I Mr. Horst stated that the merchants have been involved in the discussions about landscaping, and <br />2 was under the impression that mostly bushes would be planted as opposed to tall trees that would <br />3 obscure the view of the businesses. <br />4 Faust restated his suggestion about incorporating a minimum assessment agreement so that the <br />5 City would be protected in the future and would be able to retain the tax rate if the property sold. <br />6 Furthermore, he suggested that the agreement incorporate language that would require the Center <br />7 owners to agree to an amount that the property was worth in order to receive TIF financing. <br />8 Ranallo expressed concern about item nos. 12 and 13 of the Letter of Understanding and inquired <br />9 if those items could be eliminated. He supported the Plan, and agreed with Marks about the <br />10 possibility of moving the gazebo to a quieter spot, but he was reluctant to tie a future City <br />I I Council with the situations posed in items 12 and 13. <br />12 Morrison clarified that the items specify "negotiations" and that the City would not be committed <br />13 to following through with any sale that is not desired. <br />14 Ranallo requested that City Attorney Bill Soth review the Letter of Understanding. Morrison <br />replied that Mr. Soth has reviewed the Letter, and clarified that this is more of a policy issue up <br />to the City. <br />17 Thuesen stated that he respected Ranallo's hesitation about item nos. 12 and 13, but he believed <br />18 that the City would benefit from keeping those items in place and exploring those issues. He <br />19 would be reluctant to limit the City's options by excluding the issues presented in item nos. 12 <br />20 and 13. <br />21 Marks agreed with Thuesen and believed that the way item nos. 12 and 13 were written, that a <br />22 future Council would not be tied into any course of action. He felt that those issues provided an <br />23 opportunity to negotiate. Marks stressed that he believed the project as a whole should move <br />24 ahead with all due speed. <br />25 Cavanaugh disagreed because, he stated, there is a sum of money available until the end of the <br />26 year that is driving the agenda for the redevelopment. He believed there are unresolved issues, <br />27 Morrison acknowledged that the pace is fast; however, if the funds available are not allocated by <br />28 the end of this year, it could be more difficult to put the plan together and arrange for alternative <br />29 funding. <br />30 Ranallo suggested that he felt the public would want to be aware of potential changes, such as <br />moving the fire station or closing the liquor store, and advised the Commissioners to obtain <br />public input. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.