My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 08222000
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000
>
CC PACKET 08222000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:17:27 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:16:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
17
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1999-2001
SP Name
CC PACKET 08222000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> August 8, 2000 <br /> • Page 3 <br /> 1 the Council some of the important points that have been discussed to date with regard to the <br /> 2 preliminary plan for the Apache Plaza Redevelopment. <br /> 3 Mr. Shardlow then reviewed for the Council a document known as "Exhibit A" and was . <br /> 4 incorporated into the Council's agenda packets as page 57. This document reviewed and set <br /> 5 forth the permitted uses for the new redevelopment,which would be known as "Silver Lake <br /> 6 Centre," a high tech office campus. <br /> 7 Mr. Shardlow fielded various questions from the Councilmembers regarding the specifics of the <br /> 8 plan. <br /> 9 Thuesen commented that this issue is a matter of how closely the City wants the PUD held, and <br /> 10 how much the City is willing to struggle to keep the PUD that tight. <br /> 11 Sparks inquired if the community space would be publicly owned. Anthony Gleekel, attorney <br /> 12 for Hillcrest Development, interjected that the community space would be provided by Hillcrest <br /> 13 Development for the public's use, but would not be publicly owned. <br /> 14 Cavanaugh inquired about the significance of the approval of the Planning Commission. City <br /> 15 Attorney Soth noted that the significance was that the Planning Commission recommended <br /> 6 approval to the Council. He further noted that the Planning Commission was the advisory <br /> 7 Commission to the Council, and did legwork and research in determining recommendations for <br /> 18 the Council. <br /> 19 Mr. Soth stated that his office would draft a PUD agreement so that the City and the developer <br /> 20 will contractually agree on exactly what would be done. <br /> 21 Cavanaugh wished to confirmed with City Attorney Soth that if the City approves the plan that <br /> 22 the Planning Commission has referred to the Council, that such document will be the primary <br /> 23 document for this generation and future generations as far as planning and zoning are concerned. <br /> 24 Cavanaugh clarified that the Planned Unit Development(PUD)would be a contract between the <br /> 25 City and the developer. <br /> 26 Cavanaugh asked for clarification from Mr. Shardlow and City Attorney Soth regarding some of <br /> 27 the specifics on Exhibit A. <br /> 28 City Attorney Bill Soth reviewed the minimum obligations of Hillcrest Development, as well as <br /> 29 the preferred obligations of Hillcrest Development. <br /> 30 Cavanaugh expressed his opinion that certain uses should be tightened up as far as definition and <br /> 31 allowable use. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.