My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 08222000
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000
>
CC PACKET 08222000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:17:27 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:16:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
17
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1999-2001
SP Name
CC PACKET 08222000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7® <br /> St. Anthony <br /> Village Properties, LLP <br /> 2500-391" Avenue NE,. Suite 230 <br /> Minneapolis, MN 55421 <br /> January 4, 2000 <br /> Railroad Lease / Parking Issue at 2801 37th Ave. NE <br /> From: Ken Solie <br /> On this date, I discussed the current land leasing <br /> philosophy of CP Rail with David Drach of CP (612-347- <br /> 8254) . He stated as follows: <br /> 1 . All new leases and lease renewals are being done on a <br /> month to month basis with 30 days notice. This is CP <br /> Rail policy and there are no exceptions . <br /> 2 . It is CP Rails position that they want to sell any land <br /> that is not essential to railroad operations . Their <br /> • asking price is the market value of neighboring land <br /> without regard to the land-locked nature of the <br /> parcels . They feel that while the land has no value to <br /> the public, it has "market value" to the owners of <br /> contiguous property. Drach said "They will hold the <br /> property for 80 years before they will sell it at less <br /> than market value" . <br /> 3 . Drach sees no reason that CP Rail would not renew our <br /> lease in the future. He stated that the only reasons <br /> for lease termination are for cause (non payment of <br /> rent) or if the railroad had a need for the land for <br /> business purposes . He did not see any pending railroad <br /> need for this land in the future. I asked him to <br /> document this in a letter, He refused. <br /> 4 . He stated that he thought there was a 100 feet wide <br /> strip through this area that could be available for <br /> lease but it seems clear that their preference would be <br /> to sell . <br /> From this discussion, it seems that the worst case scenario <br /> • would be that CP Rail refuses to renew our lease at its <br /> expiration for the purpose of forcing us to purchase the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.