Laserfiche WebLink
-8- <br /> 1 -and garage are at least four feet higher than the Flaherty home and <br /> 2 even though the new garage is 11 feet high at the roof crest,, it would is <br /> 3 still be lower than his own which would be next to it on Hilldale ,side <br /> 4 and there would be at least 15 feet between the two. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Commissioner Jones wanted any motion, to state that it was only for. the <br /> 7 garage the variance was granted so the Commission would have the <br /> 8 opportunity to at least look at any further expansion of the family <br /> 9 room. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 The hearing closed at 9 :.08 P.M. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Commissioner Bjorklund commented that when he first read the proposal <br /> 14 he had thought it would result, "in an awful lot of house filling up <br /> 15 that corner" , but , after visiting the site , he became aware of the . <br /> 16 number of very large homes in that neighborhood, which is of quite , <br /> 17 a unique spot in the City. . <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Motion by Commissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner Bowerman to <br /> 20 recommend the Council grant a variance to William Flaherty to construct <br /> 21 the garage he proposes on his Hilldale frontage within seven feet of <br /> 22 the adjacent property line , finding that: <br /> 23 - <br /> 24 1 . The Flaherty- house would have been built facing Hilldale if that <br /> 25 street had been in when the residence was constructed. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 2. The variance is not based exclusively upon the desire. of the pro- <br /> 28 perty , owner to increase the value or income potential of the parcel <br /> 29 of,-, land because - it would probably cost him more than the property <br /> 30 would appreciate. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 3 . There is a hardship created for Mr. Flaherty because he is on -a <br /> 33 corner lot and therefore front yard setbacks .on a rear yard set- <br /> 34 back is .required on three sides of the lot. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 4 . There was no opposition demonstrated against this proposal and the <br /> 37 abutting neighbor to the west indicated he favored the granting <br /> 38 of the variance . <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Motion carried unanimously . <br /> 41 <br /> 42 The meeting was recessed at 9 : 16 P.M. and when it was reconvened at <br /> 43 9 : 27 P.M. , the public hearing _was opened to consider the request for <br /> 44 the subdivision without platting by Irving Walbon of the property <br /> 45 located at the southwest corner- of 33rd -Avenue N.E. and Old 'Highway 8 <br /> 46 which- would result in- two single family residential lots from .a single <br /> 47 vacant, unplatted parcel containing about 20 ,000 square feet.. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Chair Pro Tem Zawislak read the notice of the hearing which .had,_gone <br /> 50 out to 'all adjacent property owners within 350 feet of. the subject. <br /> 51 property and-'had been ..published. February- 9th: in the Bulletin.---:,.No..;one <br /> 52 reported failure to receive the notice or objected to i— tts.content.- • <br /> 53 <br /> 54 Mri–Chi.lds had advised-:in his February, 13th memorandum that the lot , <br /> 55 split could result-:::in-.-a. single family interior- lot of. 9.,600..,square <br />