My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 08281984
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1984
>
CC PACKET 08281984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:58:52 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:58:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 08281984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f j <br /> :.' CI-TY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br /> ------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- - <br /> Date Submitted - - :Type of Action Requested -Agenda: Item Number <br /> Resolution Reports-la <br /> August 24, 1984 Ordinance <br /> Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title St.I Anthony Town-. <br /> Other <br /> August 28, 1984 homes Sign Request <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> TO: Mayor and Councilmen <br /> FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Attached is a proposal to take the existing <br /> wooden signs for the St. Anthony Townhomes and mount them on a berm in a singular <br /> V-shaped structure with substantive brick work supporting them. A similar concept <br /> to the sign was approved for Elmwood Church a few years ago. The Planning Commission <br /> has recommended approval with conditions as shown in their minutes. <br /> Because both the townhomes and the Craig .Morris beauty shop are part of the original. <br /> Hedlund PUD, the Commission has recommended that only the townhouse sign be allowed <br /> to remain . A motion made on June 19th recommended that the Craig Morris free stand- <br /> ing sign be removed. The beauty shop is for sale and both Mr. Hedlund and Mr. <br /> iMorris feel that the prospective owners should have the ability to have some sort of <br /> sign (somewhat smaller than the Morris sign) to identify the business. Prospective <br /> buyers will be at the meeting and I would recommend that the Council vote to allow <br /> a freestanding sign not larger than 50 square feet (25 square feet per side) and <br /> not higher than 60 inches above the base be allowed for the Morris property. The <br /> Planning Commission did not vote on such an issue but generally seemed to regard a <br /> smaller sign as an acceptable situation for the property. <br /> • CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS : <br /> m � �- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.