Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> of Health letter recommending that the well be closed. In for relief outlined above, only two statutes provide a possible <br /> that event, a claim by the City of St. Anthony under the basis for St. Anthony to recover its attorney fees in this <br /> Federal Tort Claims Act must first be brought to the Department ; litigation, namely, CERCLA and MERLA. <br /> of the Army by October 1985. Once the claim to the Department Under CERCLA, Section 107(a) allows a plaintiff <br /> of the Army is made, St. Anthony should expect to commence to recover "all costs" and "any other necessary costs of <br /> i <br /> suit within six (6) months of bringing such claim. Likewise, response" which are the result of a release of hazardous <br /> the three (3) year statute of limitations that might be asserted substances. Although Section 107(a) does not specifically <br /> under CERCLA should be kept in mind since the City would provide for attorney fees, in United States v. Northeastern <br /> have to assert its CERCLA claim by October 1986. Further, Pharmaceutical & Chemical Company, Inc., 579 F. Supp. 823, <br /> before bringing any lawsuit under RCRA, St. Anthony must 850-851 (W.D. Mo. 1984) the court held that the United States <br /> give sixty (60) days prior notice to the Environmental Protection was entitled to recover its attorney fees as well as other <br /> Agency, the State of Minnesota and any alleged violators. administrative costs in cleaning up a hazardous waste site. <br /> Because the City of St. Anthony has incurred damages This decision is an isolated opinion which may be rejected <br /> like, but much smaller than those of the City of New Brighton, by other jurisidictions. It is also unclear whether the <br /> it would be most efficient and cost-effective for the City reasoning in this case would be extended by another court <br /> of St. Anthony to simply intervene in the action of the City to award attorney fees to plaintiffs other than the United <br /> of New Brighton. The City of St. Anthony must, however, States or a state. <br /> intervene in a timely fashion so as not to have any of its Although the issue of a plaintiff's right to attorney <br /> claims barred by the statute of limitations. Conversations fees is still open to question under CERCLA, in MERLA, Minn. <br /> with the New Brighton attorneys suggests that the City of Stat. § 115B.14, a prevailing party in an action brought <br /> New Brighton is anxious to have St. Anthony intervene in under the statute may be awarded its costs, disbursements <br /> this action. and reasonable attorney and witness fees. Since any lawsuit <br /> ATTORNEYS' FEES AND LITIGATION EXPENSES brought by the City of St. Anthony will likely assert a claim <br /> A plaintiff is only allowed its attorney fees incurred under MERLA, the City should be able to recover its attorney <br /> in litigation when a statute so provides. In the claims fees in any such litigation. In most cases, however, the <br /> amount of attorney fees recovered is usually less than that <br /> expended. <br /> - 18 - - 19 - �► <br />