My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 09251984
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1984
>
CC PACKET 09251984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:59:52 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:59:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 09251984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
by any other person, such as the City of St. Anthony, and any research memoranda or other documents on which it based <br /> any damages or injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural this interpretation. Further, the City of New Brighton had <br /> resources. asked the Justice Department to prepare a Stipulation Agreement <br /> Pursuant to § 112(d) of CERCLA, a claim for removal promising not to assert the statute of limitations against <br /> or remedial action or for damages to natural resources cannot St. Anthony if they delayed bringing their lawsuit. The <br /> be presented to the federal Superfund for payment nor may Justice Department never did produce any memoranda nor the <br /> an action be commenced for "damages", defined in CERCLA, requested Stipulation Agreement. <br /> Section 101(6), as natural resources damages, unless the Based on the foregoing, under CERCLA, caution suggests <br /> claim is presented to the Superfund or an action commenced that a three (3) year statute of limitations be observed <br /> within three (3) years from the date of discovery of the and that a civil action be commenced under CERCLA within <br /> loss, or the date of enactment of the statute, whichever three (3) years from the date of discovery of the loss in <br /> is later. This statute of limitations provision contains order to preserve the claim. <br /> no specific limitation with respect to a claim to recover B. Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 <br /> remedial or removal costs, commonly referred to as clean-up The City of New Brighton has also brought a claim <br /> costs, in a civil action. The attorneys for the City of against the United States and its departments under the Federal <br /> New Brighton believe this gap in the statute may invite a Tort Claims Act, Title 28, U.S.C. § 1346, for injury or loss <br /> statute of limitations problem for potential plaintiffs who of property caused by the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions <br /> seek to recover clean-up costs. of any employee of the government while acting within the <br /> The United States Department of Justice had attempted scope of his or her office or employment. In this case, <br /> to urge New Brighton not to bring their lawsuit when they the City of New Brighton has alleged that employees of the <br /> did on the basis that CERCLA contained no statute of limitations United States, while acting within the scope of their employment, <br /> for clean-up costs and therefore, the six (6) year statute negligently or wrongfully stored, disposed of, or permitted <br /> of limitations that applies to all other federal claims, the storage or disposal of hazardous waste at TCAAP, for <br /> namely, Title 28, U.S.C. § 2401(a), applies. The City of which the United States is liable under the Federal Tort <br /> New Brighton had asked the Department of Justice to produce Claims Act. <br /> t <br /> I <br /> , <br /> 1 <br /> - 4 - , - 5 - <br /> iel <br /> e <br /> 1 <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.