Laserfiche WebLink
-10- <br /> said he- was very much . in favor of the changes , per- <br /> 1 ceiving' this would restate the existing Ordinance for <br /> 2 better enforcement; <br /> .3 <br /> 4 agreed that having the beer truck parked. around the <br /> 5 Village: for year-s was .one of the matters which the <br /> 6 new Ordinance would address; <br /> 1 <br /> 8 disputed that the Ordinance took away anyone ' s rights <br /> 9 to house a family in a home built large enough to ac- <br /> 10 commodate them; <br /> 11 <br /> 12 -said he had seen huge delivery trucks parked every <br /> 13 day• in front of residences or in their driveways and <br /> 14 hoped the Ordinance would be enforced to keep com- <br /> 15 mercial vehicles in commercial areas ; <br /> 16 <br /> 17 -was glad to see the Ordinance requiring vehicles to <br /> 8 be parked on paved areas , but wanted to see something <br /> 18 written in to guarantee no more than perhaps a <br /> 20 quarter of the front yards would be paved over but <br /> 21 at least so that paving doesn' t absorb the whole <br /> 22 front yard. Wouldn' t want to see a "concrete jungle <br /> 23 out there. " ; <br /> 24 <br /> 5 -thinks the City is flirting with just that with this <br /> 2 Ordinance if some landscaping is not required as <br /> 25 <br /> 26 well; <br /> 28 <br /> 28 -wanted setbacks from the property lines and struc- . <br /> 30 tures better defined to correct the impression that <br /> 31 the property owner can control access to the City' s <br /> 32 boulevard next to the road; <br /> 33 <br /> 34 -suggested paved areas not be allowed within a stated <br /> 5 dis.tance ' from the property lines to avoid problems <br /> 35 with snow storage, etc. and to assure people like <br /> 37 joggers to use the boulevards; <br /> 38 <br /> 38 -the setback from the structure would assure that no <br /> 40 damage occurred to the residence from fire or an <br /> 41 explosion in a car parked in a paved area too close <br /> 42 to the structure; <br /> 43 <br /> 44 -Commissioner Hansen later questioned this suggestion, <br /> 45 saying there are no restrictions against parking <br /> 46 cars next to structures in attached garages or on <br /> 46 driveways close to the homes; <br /> 48 -suggested the City should research other cities to <br /> 4 protect St. Anthony from challenges to the new Ordin- <br /> 50 ances..' - He didn',t believe the City should become the <br /> 51 pacesetters with "these ordinances but rather could <br /> • 52 <br /> 53 <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />