Laserfiche WebLink
-12- <br /> - <br /> challenged . Commissioner Werenicz ' connecting his <br /> 1 "lifestyle" , with -the City' s- efforts to- maintain the <br /> 2 public safety, welfare , high standard of living, :and.. <br /> 3 betterment of the community; and <br /> 4 <br /> -5 . -reiterated his statement about nobody being forced to <br /> 6 move next to his large family. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Jeff Lofgren, 3109 Stinson Boulevard <br /> 9 <br /> 10 -indicated he now lives at thsabove address but has <br /> 11 owned three other homes in the Village; <br /> 12 <br /> 13 -opposed the amendment which would limit the number of <br /> 14 unrelated persons in the same household to 3 (he pre- <br /> 15 ferred 4 ) ; <br /> 16 <br /> 17 -thought in his own case, where he is unmarried and <br /> 18 has to make payments on an $85 ,000 four bedroom house <br /> 19 he should be allowed to rent the extra three bedrooms <br /> 20 to make those payments; <br /> 21 <br /> 22 -thought the whole Ordinance change had come about be- <br /> 23 cause -his neighbors had complained to Councilmember <br /> 24 Ranallo about the beer truck he had licensed for <br /> 25 9 ,000 pounds being parked in front of his home and <br /> 26 also complained about his having a roommate and a <br /> 27 couple who had just gotten married living with him. <br /> 28 Those neighbors accused him of trying . to convert his <br /> 29 single family home into a duplex; <br /> 30 <br /> 31 -said the beer truck had been parked at his father ' s <br /> 32 home and at various City locations for the past <br /> 33 5 years; <br /> 34 <br /> 35 -insisted the City Manager in April had told him the <br /> 36 current Ordinance allows six unrelated persons to <br /> 37 live in the same house but rather that he could have <br /> 38 "three unrelated persons besides yourself" , which put <br /> 39 him in compliance at that time; <br /> 40 <br /> 41 -agreed with the City' s efforts to remove the <br /> 42 "junkers" from residential area, perceiving that if a <br /> 43 car is a collector ' s item, its owner would never <br /> 44 leave it in the backyard; <br /> 45 <br /> .46 pointed out that he had moved the beer truck even <br /> 47 though he didn' t have to because it was licensed <br /> 48 although there is- a person on 33rd and Rankin who <br /> 49 parks semi-trucks in his . backyard; which is certainly <br /> 50 in violation with the ordinance; <br /> 51 <br /> • 52 - believed' he was being harrassed because his neighbor <br /> 53 had a friend on the City Council; <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />