Laserfiche WebLink
-9- <br /> 1- perceived it might be too severe-. to require the undeveloped <br /> 2 lots, to be graded to the same level . as- the .existing homes on <br /> 3 Belden and ,that a four or,. five foot .differential •might be <br /> 4 reasonable; <br /> 5 <br /> 6 -wanted assurance that the lots would be buildable, but would <br /> 7 not put undue hardship on the neighbors because of drainage or <br /> 8 to have drainage problems. himself; . <br /> 9 <br /> 10 -said he and his fiancee who was with him, would naturally like <br /> 11 to keep the existing view of the skyline, but that would not be <br /> 12 the deciding factor in their decision to build. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Kurt Matthys, 9760 Monroe Street, Blaine <br /> 15 _ <br /> 16 -indicated he was interested in one of the lots which front. on <br /> 17 Silver Lake Road and would not like to have a high dropoff <br /> 18 between his and his neighbor' s property on Belden -Drive; .--- <br /> 19 <br /> 20 '-wanted as many trees preserved on his lot as possible to shield - <br /> 21 his home from the noise on Silver Lake Road. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Mr. Childs said he was recommending the Planning Commission suggest <br /> 24 the subdivision- without platting be denied and that- the Council <br /> 25 direct the developer to return simultaneously with a final plat for <br /> 26 four lots and a drainage plan for Commission consideration at a <br /> 27 future meeting where the neighbors would be able to react to both <br /> 28 plans. The Manager reiterated that whatever arrangement the City <br /> 29 had made with Mr. Forsberg -and Dr. Osterbauer related to retaining <br /> 30 walls would be part of the basis for establishing grading for the <br /> 31 undeveloped lots. He suggested there might be agreements- reached . <br /> 32 whereby the grading for the new lots might be stepped up and <br /> 33 retaining walls provided on the back of those properties as well. <br /> 34 " <br /> 35 There were no further concerns expressed and the hearing was closed <br /> 36 at 9 : 00 P.M. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Commission Recommendation - - <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Commissioner Madden said he would not entirely rule out the _- <br /> 41 subdivision without platting for this property but agreed it should <br /> 42 be denied at this point. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Motion" by Madden, seconded by Werenicz to - recommend •- -that the - -- <br /> 45 Council deny the request from David Evanson to subdivide without <br /> 46 Platting the property at approximately 351.2• Silver Lake Road at <br /> 47 -least for the present and instead,-. direct - the applicant to prepare <br /> 48 a -.final plat and a grading .plan which would be consistent.-with the <br /> 49 City' s requirements and .the neighbors '.. concerns about drainage. <br /> 50 The -plan should also satisfy the City as to., the proper - legal <br /> • 51 -descriptions for the property and provide for- 5 foot drainage and <br /> 52 utility easements similar to those provided for the Johnson and <br /> 53 Hertog subdivisions. <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />