My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 05261987
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1987
>
CC PACKET 05261987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:05:43 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:05:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 05261987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• -3- <br /> Ordinance Considered Which Would Make Non-Compliance With Ban_ A <br /> Misdemeanor <br /> Councilmember Enrooth said he : knew of. instances of residents who knew <br /> about the ban last ..weekend and consciously continued sprinkling in spite <br /> of that knowledge. When -he said he perceived any ban which the • Council <br /> would be imposing that- evening would, in all reality, be only a request <br /> for compliance, staff agreed that the Council . could adopt an ..emergency <br /> ordinance that evening which would provide a penalty for non-compliance. <br /> Councilmember Marks .indicated he thought some residents had-just not been <br /> aware that the ban had been imposed. He said he heard one TV broadcast <br /> which reported - the ban, but gave no reason for its imposition. , He had <br /> called that station to let them know the, City was not just arbitrarily <br /> enforcing a sprinkling ban, but that St. Anthony faced a serious water <br /> shortage for which there were higher priorities than just watering lawns. <br /> Mr. Childs indicated all the media he contacted had been fully informed <br /> about why the ban was necessary. <br /> The proposal to adopt an ordinance that evening prompted the following <br /> response: <br /> • Makowske said she would be hesitant to pass an ordinance about an <br /> issue which ' the agenda that .evening had made no mention at ' <br /> all. <br /> Ranallo suggested the ordinance could be developed for consideration <br /> at the next meeting so any future ban could be enforced. <br /> Childs commented that he did not perceive the level -of non- <br /> compliance to be a major problem at this point in time <br /> because on the whole, people had been pretty cooperative; <br /> indicated that for staff to attempt to -address the ban with <br /> a newsletter would probably get the information to the resi- <br /> dents too late to get compliance during the current emer- . . <br /> gency.' <br /> Hamer suggested a 3 : 00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. ban might be a problem <br /> for commercial property owners in the Industrial Parkas well <br /> as City workers because most workers would -be gone for. most <br /> of those hours; <br /> reiterated that in the . case of the City parks, it would be <br /> better not to: sprinkle them at all during emergency periods. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.