Laserfiche WebLink
1 -6- <br /> 2 <br /> 3 perceived the two engineers and the grading contractor <br /> 4 who had been present for the hearing had not appeared to <br /> 5 have any real problems with the grading/drainage plan <br /> 6 per se, but had just wanted to get the slope differ- <br /> 7 entials nailed down; <br /> 8 <br /> 9 suggested if the Council decided to make approval con- <br /> 10 tingent on the Public Works Director ' s review of the <br /> 11 grading pians, their motion should also include approval <br /> 12 of the final plan by the City Attorney. <br /> 13 <br /> 14Three other persons were present for the discussion. John Forsberg, who <br /> 15owns the adjacent property at 3513 Belden Drive, stated that the revised <br /> 16plans "seemed- to meet all the requirements I was looking for" and said he <br /> 17would be in favor of the Council approving the grading plan subject to <br /> 18the Public Works Director ' s approval. <br /> 19 <br /> 20Chris Paidosh and -Kurt Matthys, prospective buyers of two of the lots, <br /> 21indicated they were present only- as spectators of the discussions. <br /> 22 <br /> 23Council Action. <br /> 24 <br /> 25When 'Councilmember Enrooth' s motion to table the decision until the <br /> 26Council' s June 23rd meeting failed for lack of a second, it was suggested <br /> 27that a decision might be deferred until the Council meeting which wouldle <br /> 28take the place, of the regularly scheduled June 9th meeting, which <br /> 29conflicted with the League of Minnesota Cities conference in Rochester. <br /> 30 <br /> 31Mr. Evanson indicated a June 3rd meeting would be acceptable to him <br /> 32because he was certain he would have the slope easement and Certificate <br /> 33of Title, 'which Mr. 'Soth had told him would be necessary for that <br /> 34meeting, available by that time. <br /> 35 <br /> 36Motion by -Enrooth;. seconded by Makowske to cancel the June 9th Council <br /> 37meeting and reschedule it for 5 : 10 P.M. , Wednesday, June 3 , . 1987 , at <br /> 38which time- a decision on Mr. Evanson' s request could be made. This .delay <br /> 39would give the Council an opportunity to get staff feedback on which to <br /> 40base that decision. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 43 <br /> 44DEPARTMENTS AND COMMITTEES <br /> 45 <br /> 46The following reports were ordered filed as informational after short <br /> 47discussions of several items in the first two reports: <br /> 48 <br /> 49 *May 11th report from the Edward J. Hance law firm on matters con- <br /> 50 ducted at the Hennepin County District Court on May 6 , 1987 in which <br /> 51 they represented the City as City Prosecutor; <br /> 52 <br /> 53 *April Fire Department report; <br /> 54 <br />