My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 12081987
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1987
>
CC PACKET 12081987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:26:24 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:26:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
18
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1987-1989
SP Name
CC PACKET 12081987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br /> For ' each of the Poll-owing characterist-ics, please rate the <br /> • Saint Anthony City Hall facility or- staff as excellent , <br /> good , only fair , or poor . . . . <br /> I <br /> EXC GOOD, ONLY POOR D.K. / <br /> FAIR REF . <br /> 56 . Waiting time <br /> for service? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 57. Courtesy of <br /> the staff? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 58. Efficiency of <br /> the staff? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 59. Atmosphere of <br /> City Hall ? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 60. Cleanliness of <br /> the building? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> The water supply for the City was contaminated by waste products <br /> from the Twin Cities Army Arsenal facility' in Arden Hills. The <br /> federal government has agreed to build a carbon filtration system <br /> to purify the city' s water supply . In the meantime, the State of <br /> Minnesota has certified that the current purity of the water <br /> meets state requirements. <br /> 61 . Are you currently using city ABOUT AS MUCH. . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> water about as much as you did CUT BACK IN USE. . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> prior to the discovery of the TAKE PRECAUTIONS ( VOL . ) .3 <br /> contamination, or have you cut DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .4 <br /> back in its use? <br /> 62. Do you feel that the filtration SUFFICIENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I <br /> system will be sufficient to pro- FURTHER ACTION. . . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> tect the water supply , or should DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .3 <br /> the city undertake further action? <br /> IF "FURTHER ACTION" IN QUESTION #62, ASK: <br /> 63 . What further action should the city undertake? <br /> ------------------------------------------------------ <br /> 63. How would you rate the quality EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I <br /> of education in the public GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 <br /> schools in Saint Anthony -- ONLY FAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br /> • excellent , good , only fair , or POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 <br /> poor? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . .5 <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.