Laserfiche WebLink
Comparison of Copy Machines for Replacement of Existing Machine <br /> • <br /> Copier Use rating Best Liked Feature/Least Liked Cost <br /> Canon 2 Copy Quality Constant paper $6,552 <br /> jamming in + $ .0145 <br /> duplexer per copy <br /> maint. <br /> Panasonic 2 Copy Quality Paper jams & $6,650 <br /> sturdy paper auto-revers. (no maint. <br /> cassette area doc.feeder cost given) <br /> Toshiba 3 Easy to under- Auto-revers. $10,890 <br /> stand how to doc.feeder + $.0163 <br /> run jammed freq. per copy <br /> maint. <br /> Ricoh 4 Copy Quality Paper diffic. $8 , 448 <br /> • easy to run to remove from + $ .0137 <br /> sorter; noisy per copy <br /> maint. <br /> Minolta 4 or 5 Copy Quality; Paper feeder $8,103 <br /> sorter jammed + $ .013 <br /> per copy <br /> maint. <br /> Use Rating based on 1-5 ( lowest to highest) <br /> Based on demonstrations of all of the above machines in the City <br /> offices. The finalists have been narrowed to the Ricoh and the <br /> Minolta machines. Pictures of both are attached. Both are <br /> 40cpm machines, with enlargement, reduction, two side copying, <br /> sorter and document feed capabilities. The 1988 Budget showed <br /> $7, 000 for replacement of the copier, however about $1, 500 of the <br /> cost will be paid by the Liquor Fund due to their usage of the <br /> machine. A final recommendation between the two machines will be <br /> ready for the Tuesday meeting. <br />