My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 02241988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1988
>
CC PACKET 02241988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:27:53 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:27:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
18
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1987-1989
SP Name
CC PACKET 02241988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 ORDINANCE 1988-003 <br /> •2 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO WATER RATES; AMENDING <br /> 3 SUBDS. 2 AND 3 OF SECTION 550 : 00 OF THE 1973 <br /> 4 CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> 5 Voting on the motion: <br /> 6 Aye: Ranallo, Marks, Makowske , Sundland. <br /> 7 Nay: Enrooth. <br /> 8 Motion carried. <br /> 9 Ordinance 1988-004 , relating to sewer rate increases, was discussed at <br /> 10 length. An automatic increase of about 12 cents per ccf occurred as <br /> 11 of January . 1, 1988, because of the charges from the Metropolitan Waste <br /> 12 Control Commission. The additional 10 cent increase would be needed <br /> 13 due to the repairs which need to be made to the Foss Road Lift Station <br /> 14 and the increase could be put off until this summer when the work on <br /> 15 the lift station begins. Councilmembers Enrooth and Marks suggested <br /> 16 that the Council "wait and see" just how much of an increase would be <br /> 17 needed for the lift station repairs before incurring the increase. <br /> 18 Therefore, there was no Council action on Ordinance 1988-004 to <br /> 19 increase the sewer rates. <br /> 20 Benefits of Northern Mayors ' Association Membership Discussed <br /> 0, Enrooth sees limited benefit for St. Anthony. <br /> 22 Makowske thinks the only gain would be that it would be a good <br /> 23 investment because there would be continued good valu- <br /> 24 ation on St. Anthony homes . <br /> 25 Sundland asked if there would be an impact; <br /> 26 wondered what would happen if we didn' t approve of a <br /> 27 development and we were not a member; <br /> 28 believes St. Anthony would benefit as a member of the <br /> 29 Association. <br /> 30 Ranallo agreed northern area is short-changed; <br /> 31 other types of funding (other than community) should be <br /> 32 looked at; <br /> 33 if City does join organization, someone should stay active <br /> 34 as a member. <br /> 35 Marks feels transportation will be St. Anthony' s greatest benefit. <br /> • 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.