Laserfiche WebLink
• 1 exceeds the ordinance allowance of 100 square feet of <br /> 2 surface sign area for that store by 92 square feet; <br /> 3 agreed with the Chair ' s statement that "there was no <br /> 4 point in revisiting the differences in recol- <br /> 5 lections held by the City and the applicant which had <br /> 6 been fully explored during the July, 1987 meeting with <br /> 7 the applicant and at many ,Commission meetings in the <br /> 8 meantime. " ; <br /> 9 reiterated that he perceived it was now up to the <br /> 10 Commission to make an interpretation related to the <br /> 11 number of signs involved and to decide whether or not <br /> 12 to recommend the Council grant the necessary variance <br /> 13 to allow the signage to remain on the building. <br /> 1.4 Proponents: Albert Plaisted conceded that the scale on the blue <br /> 15 prints could have been wrong but reiterated he had told <br /> 16 staff from the very beginning that the logos and let- <br /> 17 tering in the mansard roof had to be ordered as is from <br /> 18 the parent Dairy Queen office and that he could not <br /> 19 have that particular roof style without that standard <br /> 20 company identification; but <br /> 21 insisted that signage had been accurately depicted on <br /> • 22 the blue prints even if the scale might have been off; <br /> 23 said he was not denying that the misunderstandings had <br /> 24 resulted from his not giving more specific and accurate <br /> 25 information related to his plans to level the building <br /> 26 and the extent of the signage he was proposing to <br /> 27 erect on the building after it was rebuilt; <br /> 28 indicated the signs on the north and south side of the <br /> 29 building consisted of a 3 by 5 foot Dairy Queen logo <br /> 30 attached to the same panel as the 22 and 18 inch neon <br /> 31 Dairy Queen letters (each side would have 72 square <br /> 32 feet of signage if Commission interprets logo and let- <br /> 33 tering as one sign. ) . <br /> 34 Janet Plaisted in reference to Commissioner Hansen' s <br /> 35 comments about "ignored notices" said she had unsuc- <br /> 36 cessfully tried to contact Mr. Childs by phone after <br /> 37 receiving one of these letters and his absence from <br /> 38 the City coupled with the fact that she and her hus- <br /> 39 band had been traveling between their stores accounted <br /> 40 for some of the response delay. <br /> 41 The hearing. was closed at 8: 06 P.M. for formulation of a recommenda- <br /> 42 tion to the Council. <br /> 5 <br />