My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 02241988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1988
>
CC PACKET 02241988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:27:53 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:27:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
18
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1987-1989
SP Name
CC PACKET 02241988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A Waste Management Company <br /> • <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> Hennepin County requires municipalities to recycle 167 of their waste <br /> streams by 1988. To achieve the County's 167 goal, municipalities must <br /> implement ambitious recycling programs aimed at recovering as much <br /> material as possible. For this project, we are relying on our obser- <br /> vation of other programs throughout the country, as well as our own <br /> experience gained through the operation of curbside collection programs <br /> in Santa Rosa, San Jose, Livermore, and Oceanside, California; Camden, <br /> New Jersey; and Brampton, Ontario. <br /> By blending the proven elements of other programs with the unique require- <br /> ments of St. Anthony, we have designed an effective, reliable, and effi- <br /> cient system. Most successful residential recycling systems, while dif- <br /> fering greatly from city to city, share two important features: conve- <br /> nience for participants and effective promotion. These two features and <br /> their implications for the municipalities soliciting this proposal, are <br /> discussed below. <br /> Convenience for Participants <br /> • Recycling programs that are convenient for residents have higher partici- <br /> pation rates and recycle more material. The three most important factors <br /> affecting recycling convenience are frequency of collection, storage for <br /> recyclables, and preparation requirements. <br /> Weekly collection is the most effective collection frequency. Programs <br /> offering weekly collection achieve much higher participation rates than <br /> programs offering monthly collection. Typical participation rates for <br /> weekly programs include Austin, Texas, 60 - 707 of eligible households; <br /> San Jose, California, 557; and Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 757. Typi- <br /> cal participation rates for monthly programs, in contrast, include Edina, <br /> 19 - 237 of eligible households; Minneapolis, 22 - 257; and Mound, 207. <br /> Weekly programs encourage participation for several reasons. First, it <br /> is easier for residents to remember to set our recyclables on a given day <br /> of the week than on a given day of the month. For example, it is easier <br /> to remember that recycling day is Wednesday than it is to remember that <br /> recycling day is the third day of each month. For the same reason, par- <br /> ticipation is even greater when recyclables are collected on the same day <br /> as garbage. Then, residents need only to remember that "garbage day" is <br /> recycling day as well. <br /> Residents who forget a monthly collection day can be greatly inconvenienced <br /> by the need to set aside space for two months' accumulation of recyclables. <br /> Newspapers, in particular, can pile up rapidly. Storage requirements for <br /> • monthly programs can also create fire hazards and attract rodents and insects. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.