Laserfiche WebLink
• 1 looking for any more business than it already has so close to the <br /> 2 homes in that area. " <br /> 3 Hansen Explains How Bypass Lane Had Evolved <br /> 4 The Commission representative indicated the bypass lane had not been <br /> 5 part of TCF' s original proposal and. had only been added as one of the <br /> 6 recommendations from the firm retained. to research better traffic flow <br /> 7 and parking patterns for the property in response to complaints from <br /> 8 neighbors at the February 16th Commission hearing about bank customers <br /> 9 driving back out on 39th Avenue to park when they were unable to use <br /> 10 the drive up facilities or park near the bank. <br /> 11 Council Action <br /> 12 Motion by Makowske, seconded by Enrooth to grant a conditional use <br /> 13 permit to TCF Banking and Savings FA to allow the proposed expansion <br /> 14 of their existing drive up facilities on the north side of the property <br /> 15 at 3899 Silver Lake Road from two to four lanes subject to: <br /> 16 1. TCF following through with all the landscaping shown on the <br /> 17 revised site plans presented at the Planning Commission' s March R <br /> 18 15 ,. 1988 meeting by: <br /> 19 a. making every effort to save the existing maple trees on the <br /> !20 north side; <br /> 1 b. berming that area up by at least two feet; and <br /> 22 C. providing whatever additional landscaping is needed to buffer <br /> 23 the new facilities from the neighboring residential areas <br /> 24 north of TCF' s property. <br /> 25 2 . A stop sign being installed at the end of TCF' s driveway exiting <br /> 26 on 39th Avenue N.E. <br /> 27 In granting the conditional use permit, the Council finds, as did the <br /> 28 Planning Commission, that: <br /> 29 1 . TCF had responded in the affirmative to all three questions re- <br /> 30 lated to conditions which must be satisfied before a conditional <br /> 31 use permit can be authorized; and <br /> 32 2 . Bank officials had addressed all major issues raised by the <br /> 33 neighbors during the February 16th public hearing on their request <br /> 3-4 and- the traffic study the Commission requested at that hearing <br /> 35 appears to have produced a plan which should work well for this <br /> 36 site. <br /> 37 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 38 Motion by Marks, seconded by Makowske to grant the necessary variance <br /> 39 to allow expansion of the existing canopy on the north side of the TCF <br /> �0 property at 3899 silver Lake Road to within 31 feet of the north <br /> 7 <br />