My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 06281988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1988
>
CC PACKET 06281988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:30:37 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:30:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
18
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1987-1989
SP Name
CC PACKET 06281988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 of non-conformance. The Mayor said he was suggesting his callers <br /> 2 make lists of the latter to be submitted to City Hall for follow-up • <br /> 3 on the violations. <br /> 4 When Councilmember Ranallo reported some of his callers were still <br /> 5 confused about just when they could water their lawns, he was told <br /> 6 the City's schedule had been published in the papers when it first <br /> 7 went into effect and had been broadcast over both radio and <br /> 8 television since then. One of the television stations even has a <br /> 9 City Line where residents can call to get the exact hours they can <br /> 10 water in St. Anthony. <br /> 11 Hand Watering Doesn't Violate City's Ordinance <br /> 12 The above clarification was made by the City Manager after hearing a <br /> 13 report that one City resident had been filmed with a hose in her <br /> 14 hand by a TV crew who were televising "sprinkling cheaters" . Mr. <br /> 15 Childs added that every City Manager he had talked to had reported <br /> 16 having the same type of communication and compliance problem. He <br /> 17 then reminded the Councilmembers that the City's sprinkling ban would <br /> 18 no longer be necessary after the carbon filtration system <br /> 19 installation is completed early in July and the City is able to <br /> 20 reopen Well #3 . In the meantime, the City hasn't run out of water <br /> 21 and the Police Reserves are continuing to talk to residents who are <br /> 22 not complying with the restrictions. <br /> 23 City's Administration Fee for Burglar Alarms to be Reviewed <br /> 24 Mayor Sundland reported hearing from one resident who was "quite* <br /> 25 incensed" about having to pay a $25 fee when he had the above <br /> 26 equipment installed in his home. The resident had argued that <br /> 27 charging a fee for installing such safety measures might prove to be <br /> 28 "counterproductive" and "a benefit to the criminal element in the <br /> 29 long run because citizens might decide not to put in burglar alarms <br /> 30 because of the added costs. " The Mayor confessed that he had not <br /> 31 realized alarm owners had to pay $25.00 to renew the license each <br /> 32 year and had argued that the one time fee was not so bad when you <br /> 33 considered all the administrative costs the City incurred, setting up <br /> 34 and keeping a file on each alarm, the police inspection of the <br /> 35 equipment, and the fact that the owner can have 3 false alarms <br /> 36 before he is charged. Councilmember Enrooth reported receiving <br /> 37 several complaints about the fees and wondered if the costs had been <br /> 38 fully explained to the license holders when they were first issued. <br /> 39 Mr. Childs said he would review the fees with the Police Chief to <br /> 40 ascertain the costs on which the fee structure was originally set up <br /> 41 and would have the Chief prepare a report on the matter for a future <br /> 42 Council meeting. <br /> 43 Prosvective Kenzie Terrace Project Developer Seeking Parking Lot <br /> 44 Parcel <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.