Laserfiche WebLink
1 Sundland commented that if he were Mr. Wirtz, he would certainly be <br /> 2 a lot happier to have the addition attached to the house rather than the • <br /> 3 rear of the lot. <br /> 4 Applicant Warned About What Could Happen if He Builds So Close to His <br /> 5 Property Line <br /> I <br /> 6 When Marks observed that Mr. Tomas would only have 11 feet of driveway <br /> 7 in which to park vehicles much longer than that, Mr. Tomas indicated he <br /> 8 recognized that would be a problem he has to contend with because "the <br /> 9 City has every right to plow snow on their right-of-way. " He also <br /> 10 indicated he perceived it might be advisable for him if he ever sold the <br /> 11 property, to warn the buyer that there was every chance the City crews <br /> 12 would be plowing the driveway in or vehicles parked in the driveway <br /> 13 might get hit by plowing equipment. <br /> 14 The applicant also told Makowske he clearly understood the extra <br /> s 15 bedroom he was adding for his mother could never be rented out to anyone <br /> 16 outside the family._ <br /> .17 Mr. Zebro indicated he was present that 'evening because he had gone <br /> 18 through a similar problem when he had added to his own garage and a <br /> 19 neighbor had opposed the addition because "her realtor had advised her <br /> 20 not to sign any papers. " However, the Mayor and Building Inspector at <br /> 21 that time had decided to grant him the variance for the garage in spite <br /> 22 of that opposition. Mr. Zebro indicated that when Mr. Tomas had told <br /> 23 him what had happened at the hearing, he had advised the applicant to • <br /> 24 go to the council with his application for variance because he <br /> 25 "personally believed that neither in his own or Mr. Tomas' case, should <br /> 26 one person's opinion prevent a homeowner from doing what he wants with <br /> 27 his own property. " <br /> 28 Mr. Fisher told the Council he was the "neighbor who lived across the <br /> 29 street next to the woman who had opposed the variance. " He said he was <br /> 30 also the neighbor "who allegedly had a car repair business in his <br /> 31 garage. " The proponent said that was not true and explained that: <br /> 32 *he is an electronic engineer for a company in Chaska and has nothing <br /> 33 to do with cars; <br /> 34 *he is divorced and returned to his home only two months ago when he <br /> 35 had been awarded the house and custody of his two sons who had <br /> 36 previously lived with their mother; <br /> 37 *his ex-wife had let the boys do pretty much whatever they wanted to <br /> 38 do, including having parties when she was away, which had probably <br /> 39 irritated Mrs. Hogan. <br /> 40 In relation to the requested variance, Mr. Fisher stated he had no <br /> 41 problems with what Mr. Tomas proposed to do with his property because <br /> 42 "his cars have always been tucked away and not an eyesore for me. " <br /> 10 • <br />