Laserfiche WebLink
1 interest in the property to be demonstrated in cities like Arden Hills <br /> 2 and Shorewood where similar articles are to run. <br /> 3 Mr. Soth advised the H.R.A. to continue the hearing for a few more • <br /> 4 minutes to see if any .members of the public appeared. The following <br /> 5 H.R.A. business was conducted during that period: <br /> 6 JULY 12TH REGULAR AND AUGUST 4TH SPECIAL H.R.A. MEETINGS MINUTES <br /> 7 APPROVED <br /> 8 Motion by Ranallo, seconded by Marks to approve both of the above as <br /> 9 presented. <br /> 10 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 11 CLAIMS <br /> 12 Motion by Marks, seconded by Enrooth to approve payment of $2,474 . 20 <br /> 13 to the Dorsey & Whitney law firm for legal services to the Housing and <br /> 14 Redevelopment Authority during June, 1988. <br /> 15 1 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 16 The hearing on the Evergreen proposal was resumed and the Chair <br /> 17 commented that he perceived the, reason none of the neighbors had come <br /> 18 to this hearing might be because all the issues had been so well covered <br /> 19 during previous hearings on the project. <br /> 20 The documents which Mr. Childs had attached to his memorandum in the • <br /> 21 agenda packet had included a copy of the Ramsey County Commissioners' <br /> 22 September 13 , 1982 Resolution on the St. Anthony Chandler Place <br /> 23 Project, which the Ramsey County Executive Director advised still <br /> 24 reflected the County Board's concern regarding tax increment financing. <br /> 25 Copies of the August 23rd review of the Evergreen Tax Increment <br /> 26 Financing Plan by Independent School District #282 School Superintendent <br /> 27 had been distributed prior to the hearing. The Executive Director <br /> 28 recommended the H.R.A. consider at a later date Dr. Me riwether's request <br /> 29 that revenues generated by the school's levy referendum be paid to the <br /> 30 school district. <br /> 31 Commissioner Ranallo advised the other H.R.A. members that he had put <br /> 32 money down on one of the Evergreen townhouse units and would therefore <br /> 33 be abstaining from all future votes having to do with the project, <br /> 34 including that approving the final reading on the zoning changes which <br /> 35 would require a 4/5 Council approval to be adopted. <br /> 36 The hearing was closed at 7:10 P.M. for the following motion to table: <br /> 37 H.R.A. Action <br /> 38 Motion by Marks, seconded by Enrooth to table action on the Evergreen <br /> 39 Townhouses of St. Anthony Project Redevelopment and Tax Increment Plans <br /> 2 <br /> • <br />