CC PACKET 10251988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r 5 •1 acknowledged that there was a dock on that side but said 2 by doing that, the trailer would not be next to the resi- 3 dence on Chandler Drive; 4 was told by the firm president the building' s address is 5 Chandler Drive and even though there might be an access 6 on the far south side of the building, the Chandler Road 7 access would be easier in the winter; 8 Hansen was told the distance the trailer could be sited 9 from the building would depend on- the type of wall 10 materials used and that the codes would be checked .11 regarding that point before a building permit. would be 12 issued; 13 questioned why the request had not reflected the firm' s 14 intent of moving when the lease expired in October; 15 was told by Mr. LeVahn that , with the kind of rents 16 Gelco charged, there was little chance the trailer 17 would- be left on the site once Minnesota Scientific had 18 moved. 19 wingard was told by Mr. LeVahn that the existing ash 20 tree should not be disturbed when the trailer is put in )1 place and that any sod which is damaged, would be re- 22 placed when his firm moves. 23 Franzese was told by Mr. Childs that he had been unable 24 to -find records for specific permits for similar uses 25 although he recalled a request for a trailer next to 26 Central Engineering while that firm' s building was 27 being expanded and that the trailer Elmwood Church had 28 indicated they needed during construction had never been 29 put on that site. 30 Neighbor 31 Concerns: Bill Graff , 3824 Foss Road N.E. , indicated his only con- 32 cern was that when Minnesota Scientific moved out of 33 that the trailer be removed at the same time; 34 added, however, that since Mr. LeVahn had assured the 35 Commission that would be done, he, would not be against 36 the City granting the permit. 37 No other persons were present to provide further input and the Chair 38 closed the hearing at 8: 03 P.M. for Commission consideration of a 39 recommendation to the Council.