My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 12131988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1988
>
CC PACKET 12131988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:33:59 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:33:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
18
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1987-1989
SP Name
CC PACKET 12131988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 which the Commission had not been able to get answers during the <br /> 2 hearing were cleared up. • <br /> 3 Mr. Childs indicated the City Ordinance would not prevent the store from <br /> 4 having the lights in the window, but only said they should not be <br /> 5 flashing. (He said they are not at this time. ) The City Manager <br /> 6 reported the Public Works Director was waiting to hear the Council's <br /> 7 direction that evening before proceeding with the inspection and <br /> 8 issuance of a permit for the expansion. Councilmember Makowske said she <br /> 9 personally had no problem with Mr. Belisle keeping the lights in the <br /> 10 window as long as they aren't flashing and are turned off when the store <br /> it is closed. Councilmember Enrooth indicated he was still concerned that <br /> 12 this was just another situation where a store owner takes actions with <br /> 13 complete disregard for the City's codes and ordinances and then pleads <br /> 14 ignorance and is allowed to continue to be in non-compliance. <br /> 15 Mr. Belisle stated that there had been communication problems with the <br /> 16 City regarding the lights, reiterating that he had received no response <br /> 17 - to the letter his franchise lawyer had sent to the City in 1984 <br /> 18 insisting that the lights should be considered "historical symbols" . <br /> 19 He said he had thought the matter was a dead issue when he had gotten <br /> 20 no response from the City. <br /> 21 Mr. Childs recalled that the Planning Commission had considered the <br /> 22 lawyer's letter_ and refused to accept the historical symbol concept it <br /> 23 proposed. The City Manager said although he had no copy of a letter <br /> 24 informing Mr. Belisle of that ruling, he thought he had called the <br /> 25 store owner. Since that had all happened in 1984, he couldn't be • <br /> 26 absolutely certain what action had been taken so long ago. <br /> 27 When Councilmember Ranallo expressed some concerns about the extent of <br /> 28 electrical work the store owner and the other Video Update employees had <br /> 29 done in the new space, Mr. Belisle said all they had basically done was <br /> 30 to life the electrical junction boxes up into the suspended ceiling <br /> 31 without disconnecting the conduit at all. Mayor Sundland indicated that <br /> 32 was one of the reasons he perceived it would be necessary to make the <br /> 33 permit extension contingent upon the Building Inspector's assurance that <br /> 34 the remodeling met all the necessary codes and ordinances. <br /> 35 Condition #4 in the original permit was not considered relative to the <br /> 36 permit because the stop sign it called for had been installed in the <br /> 37 meantime. Councilmember Marks said he shared Councilmember Enrooth's <br /> 38 sense of frustration with the unauthorized expansion and continuation <br /> 39 of con-conforming signage in this store. He recalled experiencing the <br /> 40 same type of frustration during the years he served on the Planning <br /> 41 Commission when applicants would come in at the last minute to request <br /> 42 an " immediate' variance for a project which had to be constructed <br /> 43 before the frost set in, etc. " The Councilmember said then as now he <br /> 44 considered these to be cases where the owners exhibited very poor <br /> 45 planning but wasn't certain what other action the City could take with <br /> 46 this expansion already completed. Councilmember Enrooth indicated he <br /> 47 would be satisfied to have the property given a thorough inspection by <br /> 4 • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.