My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 06131989
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1989
>
CC PACKET 06131989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:37:26 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:37:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
18
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1987-1989
SP Name
CC PACKET 06131989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> SPECIAL I-TEET114G OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> MAY 30 , 1989 <br /> The meeting was called to order at 6 : 05 p.m. with the Pledge <br /> of Allegiance led by Mayor Sundland . <br /> ROLL CALL <br /> Present : Enrooth , Marks , Makowske , Ranallo, Sundland <br /> Also Present : Susan VanderHeyden, Acting City Manager <br /> William Soth, City Attorney <br /> EVERGREEN TOWNHOUSES PROPOSAL <br /> Mayor Sundland led the discussion by requesting that Vern <br /> Hoium and Ursula Sheehy of Evergreen Development Corporation <br /> explain their current proposal . <br /> I•ir . Hoium reviewed the fact that Evergreen has considered <br /> several financing options , including pay-as-you-go tax <br /> increment financing, which would have a payback_ of between <br /> $250 , 000 and $270 : 000 to the developer and a reimbursement of <br /> $20 , 000 to the City for their out-of-pocket expenses . He <br /> stated that in working with the law firm of Dorsey and <br /> Whitney in attempting to draft appropriate documents , an <br /> impasse was reached when Dorsey and Whitney would not take a <br /> position as to whether or not such notes were tax exempt . He <br /> stated that counsel for Evergreen , Holmes and Graven, has <br /> stated that the notes can be made tax exempt, although some <br /> of the language in the documents drawn up by Dorsey and <br /> Whitney must be changed. Evergreen ' s impression is that <br /> Dorsey and Whitney feels that there is some exposure to the <br /> City if the notes are tax exempt , although Evergreen <br /> questions that assumption . <br /> Mr . Hoium summed up the City ' s alternatives as follows : <br /> 1 . pay-as-you-go tax increment financing; <br /> 2 . regular .G.O. bonds; <br /> 3 . abandonment of the project by Evergreen. <br /> He speculated that the cost of floating regular G.O. bonds <br /> would be in the neighborhood of $450 , 000 , and that the City <br /> might save itself $170 , 000 to $180, 000 with the pay-as-you-go <br /> tax increment financing proposal . He asked. that the City <br /> decide whether or not they want to take any risk . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.