My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 11221989
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1989
>
CC PACKET 11221989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:40:10 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
18
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1987-1989
SP Name
CC PACKET 11221989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br /> NORTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION <br /> REGULAR MEETING <br /> OCTOBER 5, 1989 <br /> PAGE 3 <br /> Ms. Joyce Gimmestad of Roseville had a complaint regarding the late <br /> fee charges; she cannot understand her bill; the rude treatment that <br /> she has received from the company and in addition to the .$2.50 late <br /> fee charge an additional $6.00 a month collection fee charge. <br /> Ms. Donnelly-Cohen informed the commission of the billing practices of <br /> the company. <br /> VII. NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE REPORT <br /> Chairman Bauer reported that discussions had continued regarding negoti- <br /> ations with the company. He stated that discussions had been held <br /> throughout the day on October 5, 1989 and a tentative deal had been made. <br /> Mr. Bauer then made a presentation using updated overheads as he had <br /> done at last months meeting to show where the negotiating committee and <br /> the company were in their negotiations. <br /> RESPONSIBILITY - Mr. Bauer stated that they still agree that the Access <br /> Corporation will take over responsibility for all the access.channels. <br /> OPERATING EXPENDITURES - The annual amount for the operating expenditures <br /> for the access function would be $450,000.00 escalated on an annual <br /> basis according to some functions. He stated that the escalation factor <br /> turned out to be the stickiest part of the entire deal. <br /> OPERATING ESCALATOR - Mr. Bauer stated that the escalator that was agreed <br /> to will range from between 57 - 87 annually or the cost of living which <br /> ever is greater. The 57 to 87 was determined based on the gross revenues <br /> using a 137 annual increase in gross revenues of a base. If the gross <br /> revenues go up 137 then the commission gets their base 57 increase in <br /> the operating expense. If the gross revenues increase greater than 137 <br /> then you add onto the 57, one-tenth of the amount as excess. If the <br /> gross revenues increase 147 or 17 more than 137, then you will add on <br /> one-tenth of that or one-tenth of a percent onto the 57. Mr. Bauer further <br /> stated that the basis for that was that the company in agreeing to the <br /> .57 base had already assumed that their gross revenues were going to <br /> increase on the order of 157 on an annual basis. The company also argued <br /> that they would not have agreed to the $450,000.00 operating budget if <br /> there was some higher amount going to the escalator. Mr. Bauer stated <br /> that the company was not very comfortable with tying the escalator to <br /> gross revenues in any way. He also stated that he was not real comfortable <br /> with the compromise result, but it seemed to be the best that the negoti- <br /> ating committee was able to do. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.