My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 06261990
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990
>
CC PACKET 06261990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:06:46 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:06:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
30
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1990-1994
SP Name
CC PACKET 06261990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> 1 for the one-foot variance . In response to a question by <br /> 2 Chairman Madden, Assistant .VanderHeyden responded that the <br /> 3 east wall of the existing garage is 15 inches inside the <br /> 4 property line on one side and that it lines up with an <br /> 5 existing chain link fence on the other side . <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Chairman Madden invited Mr . Drews to present his request to <br /> 8 the Commission. Mr . Drews replied that he is proposing to <br /> 9 build a new garage which will conform to the angular shape <br /> 10 of his lot . He stated that the existing garage is 15 inches <br /> 11 from the property line on one side and right on the property <br /> 12 line on the other side . He intends to bring the east wall <br /> 13 of the garage south 21 inches , building it three feet from <br /> 14 the property line , with the overhang being two feet from the <br /> 15 property line . He pointed out that the neighboring lot is a <br /> 16 double lot and that his garage would be relatively distant <br /> 17 from the house on that lot . <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Anne Grassman , 2608 Murray Avenue NE, commented that she <br /> 20 felt the neighborhood was ample for a three-car garage and <br /> 21 had no objection to Mr . Drews building one . She noted, <br /> 22 however , that the alley in her neighborhood has been <br /> 23 neglected for three years because of a lack of maintenance <br /> 24 funds . <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Ms . Grassman stated that Mr . Drews is currently unable to <br /> 27 bring his truck onto his property using his own driveway <br /> 28 exclusively, although his neighbor to the west allows Mr . <br /> 29 Drews to use his property for maneuvering. She said that , <br /> 30 while such an arrangement might be convenient now, a new <br /> 31 neighbor might find it unacceptable. Future conflicts <br /> 32 might develop between neighbors because of incorrect <br /> 33 surveying or because city officials who approved variances <br /> 34 are no longer in office and current officials decline to <br /> 35 take responsibility for decisions they did not make . <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Ms . Grassman stated that she lives across from a public <br /> 38 place and that people frequently turn around using her <br /> 39 property. Two of her brand-new rain pipes were run over on <br /> 40 two separate occasions, indicating that the alleyway is not <br /> 41 wide enough for traffic to maneuver. She stated that her <br /> 42 health prevents her from maintaining her property with the <br /> 43 degree of care she would prefer , and expressed a desire for <br /> 44 people ' s consideration of others ' property. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 Commissioner Wagner asked Mr . Drews whether he could move <br /> 47 the garage one foot and avoid the variance entirely, or if <br /> 48 his plan for the new garage was simply his personal <br /> 49 preference . Mr . Drews replied that it was his preference t <br /> 50 have the one foot in front of his garage rather than in back <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.