Laserfiche WebLink
1 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br /> 2 OCTOBER 13 , 1992 <br /> 3 PAGE 14 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 It was decided the length of time would be deleted and its <br /> 7 approval would be subject to the City Manager' s discretion. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Discussion continued regarding political and noncommercial <br /> 10 signs . There appeared to be some question as to what is <br /> 11 actually being addressed with this section. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Motion by Enrooth, second by Marks to table further discussion <br /> 14 of Ordinance No. 1992-008 until the Council Meeting on October <br /> 15 27th pending clarification. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 18 <br /> 19 B. Ordinance No. 1992-009, Re: Hous.ina Maintenance (Third <br /> 20 Reading) ' <br /> 21 <br /> 22 A new draft of Ordinance No 1992-009 was received from the <br /> 23 City Attorney. The City Clerk put it into amore readable form <br /> 24 as the type of the draft from the City Attorney' s office was <br /> 25 difficult to read.. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 The City Manager advised that the content of the ordinance was <br /> 28 not changed from the second reading but the number of words <br /> 29 was reduced. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Some members of the Council stated they -have received calls <br /> 32 from residents regarding some of the requirements in the <br /> 33 ordinance. Specifically, some of their concerns addressed sump <br /> 34 pumps and locks on outer doors of multiple dwellings. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Councilmember Enrooth felt it may be appropriate to delay the <br /> 37 third reading and adoption of this ordinance until some of the <br /> 38 concerns have been responded to by staff and the City <br /> 39 Attorney. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Mayor Ranallo said he does not like the way this ordinance has <br /> 42 been handled. He added, this and another agenda item, may see <br /> 43 the City Council pursuing the services of a new City Attorney <br /> 44 and a new Auditor . <br /> 45 <br /> 46 Motion by Ranallo, second by Enrooth to table Ordinance No. <br /> 47 1992-009 for clarification . <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 50 <br />