My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 03272001
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2001
>
CC PACKET 03272001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:21:06 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:20:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
17
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1999-2001
SP Name
CC PACKET 03272001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> To: Michael Mornson, City Manager <br /> From: Michael L. Larson, Liquor Operations Manager <br /> Subject: Informational Report on Wine in Grocery Stores <br /> Date: 03/26/2001 <br /> As you are aware, the wine in grocery store proposal (HF 1205) passed the sub- <br /> committee hearing by a 5-2 vote on Friday March 23rd, 2001. Now is the time for our <br /> City Council to get involved if they have concerns with this bill becoming law. <br /> believe that our City Council would not want this bill to become law due to the written <br /> language that removes all of the city's control over licensing. The proposal states that a <br /> city shall issue a license to a Supermarket that occupies a building space with at least <br /> 10,000 square feet and meets the qualifications in subdivisions 2 and 5 and section <br /> 340a.402 of the liquor statutes and rules. The proposal also states that a city shall renew <br /> the license if it finds that the licensee continues to meet the qualifications set forth in this <br /> subdivision. <br /> Under the grocer's definition of a supermarket, the proposal would allow Target, Super <br /> Target and Target Greatland, Wal-Mart, Costco, Sam's Club, K-Mart and other stores <br /> like these to sell wine. The proposal does not apply only to Cub and Rainbow grocery <br /> stores. This is a point that I don't believe the general public is aware of.. <br /> During the sub-committee hearing, the grocer's.talked about the bad publicity,that they <br /> have received regarding youth access issues. They claim that the liquor industry as well <br /> as the Doctor's and Police Chief's that testified against the proposal created a bad <br /> image of today's young adults. I contend that we have not created any image but rather <br /> recognized the facts as we see them on a daily basis, underage youth gain access to <br /> adult beverages. Reasonable thought leads me to believe that expanding access to <br /> alcohol would provide additional outlets for underage youths to obtain alcohol, either by <br /> theft or unlawful sales. The grocer's pledge to post signs, implement employee training <br /> and inspect identification for every sale does not preclude the fact that expansion of <br /> alcohol retailers in the fashion proposed could not prevent the inevitable, which is <br /> increased youth access to alcoholic beverages. <br /> With the proposal as defined,the focus has shifted from profits to youth access. While <br /> loss of revenue should be a concern, youth access to alcohol far out weigh dollars any <br /> day. Off-sale liquor stores concentrate on one product, alcohol. Minors typically are not . <br /> even employed by liquor stores. Most, if not all municipal liquor stores do'not hire <br /> anyone under the age of 21. This is a claim that supermarkets, Target, Wal-Mart and <br /> Sam's Club cannot make. <br /> Our City Council can make a difference. I believe they carry more clout with the <br /> Senators and Representatives than the grocers and the liquor industry combined. I <br /> would encourage them to contact the Senators and Representatives for our area and tell <br /> them their position on increased youth access to alcohol. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.