My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 06262001
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2001
>
CC PACKET 06262001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:52:43 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:52:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 06262001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br /> June 19, 2001 <br /> Page 13 <br /> 1 Mr. Rapp indicated that it was rare that something like that would happen where the city <br /> 2 would directly finance a parking facility. <br /> 3 <br /> . 4 Mr. Rapp stated that in the Corporate Campus example that was shown tonight, the <br /> 5 parking provides the opportunity to get more d_ensity on.the rest of-the development <br /> 6 which, ultimately, helps numbers. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Mr. Prosser added that building a ramp is a tax-increment eligible expense. He added <br /> 9 that, in many cases, it is a really good way to increase the density. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Commissioner Hanson asked who he sees as the potential buyer of the Apache Plaza <br /> 12 Mall, and will it end up being the City? Mr. Prosser stated that he hoped that the City <br /> 13 would not end up buying the'Plaza, and demolishing the existing structure. He added <br /> 14 that, typically, the developer undertakes that effort. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Commissioner Thomas indicated that energy-efficiency could be something to evaluate <br /> 17 with regard to the framework of the Redevelopment of the Northwest Quadrant. Mr. <br /> 18 Prosser indicated it would be appropriate to include in the framework, and the amount of <br /> 19 weight that is placed on energy-efficiency in the final stages is determined by the City <br /> 20 Staff, as is true with all of the other components in the framework. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Commissioner Hanson asked if the City has looked into whether, or not, they can support <br /> 23 another two thousand new residents.- Mr. Prosser stated that they could determine that as <br /> 24 they go along, but that the people themselves are not the big impact. He identified <br /> 25 shopping centers and the other areas of compact development as having the greatest <br /> 26 impact on the City. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Chair Melsha asked where they go from here. Mr. Rapp stated that they will provide the <br /> 29 Commission with a packet filled with various details, answering questions that were <br /> 30 mentioned tonight. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 The Planning Commission thanked all three gentlemen for their information. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 V. COMMITTEE REPORTS. <br /> 35 10.1 Update from Antenna Ordinance Subcommittee- Chair Melsha. <br /> 36 Chair Melsha stated that he proposed a re-draft of the proposed Antenna Ordinance. He <br /> 37 indicated that they would have a draft of the Ordinance at the next meeting for the entire <br /> 38 Commission to evaluate. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 10.2 Update from Housing Code Subcommittee. <br /> 41 Commissioner Hanson stated that they met last Thursday afternoon. He indicated that they read <br /> 42 through several documents that they received, regarding point-of-sale. They determined that <br /> 43 perhaps they hire an Enforcement Officer. <br /> 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.