Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> May 13, 2003 <br /> Page 8 <br /> 1 down. He stated the fee for this project greatly outweighs the expense of not having quality <br /> 2 facilities. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Stan Nelson, 3504 Maplewood Drive, stated he has been a resident for over 40 years. Mr. <br /> 5 Nelson noted he toured the fire station and public works facility in February. He noted at the <br /> 6 open houses, he questioned the increase of space and as to who set those amounts. Mr. Nelson <br /> 7 noted there was no response from Mr. Hartmann at that time. He stated the fire station should not <br /> 8 require more than a 40% increase in space. Mr. Nelson indicated his tax increase would be <br /> 9 roughly.$200 a year but noted there would also be other tax implications on the residents from <br /> 10 the school district, property taxes, real estate taxes, state taxes, etc. due to changes the legislature <br /> 11 is making. He indicated the tax implications were not just $200 a year due to the great changes <br /> 12 that would be upcoming in State and City government. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Mayor Hodson thanked the residents for their comments. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 C. Update on Stonehoue Properly by Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates, and <br /> 17 Authorization to Enter into a Pre-redevelopment Agreement with Amcon Construction. <br /> 18 Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers &Associates, stepped forward to address the Council. Ms. Kvilvang <br /> 19 gave a presentation on the Stonehouse property and how the Council acquired that site. She <br /> 20 noted this site has a great potential for redevelopment within the Northwest Quadrant. Ms. <br /> 21 Kvilvang reviewed a timeline for this property and events that have taken place in the recent <br /> 22 future.: <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Ms. Kvilvang noted C-70 has approached the City to purchase this property and redevelop it. <br /> 25 She noted Ehlers initiated discussions with potential developers in late 2002 with Amcon <br /> 26 presenting redevelopment options to the Council in December of 2002. Ms. Kvilvang indicated <br /> 27 if the City were to redevelop the site they would need to invest over$700,000 for parking and <br /> 28 infrastructure. She noted this would be a band-aid and would require additional funding in the <br /> 29 future. Ms. Kvilvang stated it may not be in the City's best interest to continue with this as the <br /> 30 bar needs to be set high with this property as it is at a main intersection within the community. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Ms. Kvilvang indicated it would be great to get the property back on the tax rolls creating <br /> 33 roughly$16,000-25,000 per year. She noted the City is not in the restaurant business and does <br /> 34 not know a great deal about it, where it could be better dealt with in the private sector. Ms. <br /> 35 Kvilvang stated the profitability would continue to go down as the expenses for the City would <br /> 36 continue to increase through insurance, maintenance, etc. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Ms. Kvilvang stated rehabilitation of the site is not conducive for the current needs out of the <br /> 39 site. She indicated the needs of retail tenants are different than those for the restaurant. She noted <br /> 40 more would be spent on rehab than if a developer were to start over. Ms. Kvilvang noted the site <br /> 41 needs to be updated to meet the needs of current retail delivery standards and refuse removal. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Ms. Kvilvang indicated profitability is going to be a main concern with this site. She noted there <br /> 44 needs to be a clear message in the redevelopment of this site to provide a public liquor store, a <br /> 45 restaurant with pull tabs, outdoor eating, a great design for the community. She noted the <br /> 46 Amcon proposal has two buildings, one being the restaurant with another building housing the <br />