Laserfiche WebLink
T.5- <br /> his decision on the fact that Mr. Hance had thirteen years experience <br /> • with prosecution law and procedures and had promised to closely super- <br /> vise the case work of the prosecuting attorney he would retain to do <br /> the City 's work. The Haik firm's distance from the City was the reason <br /> the Mayor gave for rating that firm last. <br /> The Hance firm was rated first by Councilman Letourneau for the same <br /> reasons cited by the Mayor, with the Haik firm second, and Johnson <br /> & Doran third. <br /> Councilman Enrooth indicated he would also be interested in retaining <br /> the firm which would be the most accessible to the Police Department <br /> and said he was also very impressed with Mr. Hance's promise to provide <br /> close supervision over any of the cases handled for the City because <br /> he saw the attorney's trial experience as a plus . He rated the. Haik <br /> firm. second and the Johnson firm third. <br /> When the ratings were tabulated, the Hance firm was first with the <br /> other two firms tied for second place. <br /> Motion by Mayor Sundland and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to adopt <br /> the resolution which designates Edward J. Hance Law Offices , Ltd. as <br /> prosecuting attorneys for the City of St. Anthony for the period <br /> commencing May 1, 1983, and ending April 30 , 1984 , and to further direct <br /> the City Manager to set up a procedure with the Dorsey firm whereby , <br /> there would be a reasonable transition and case disposal of existing <br /> • prosecutions. <br /> RESOLUTION 83-022 <br /> A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A PROSECUTING <br /> ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> Voting on the motion: <br /> Aye: ' Sundland, Enrooth, and Letourneau. <br /> Nay : Marks and Ranallo. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Mr. Childs indicated all changes which had been suggested for the new <br /> Sign Ordinance had been made in the document included in the Council <br /> agenda for its third reading for adoption. <br /> Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to adopt <br /> Ordinance 1983-001. <br /> ORDINANCE 1983-001 <br /> AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO SIGNS; AMENDING <br /> SECTION 430 OF THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES <br /> • Motion carried unanimously. <br /> > <br />