Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> -2- <br /> Mr. Hatcher told the Council just how much contaminated water he had <br /> calculated a person would have to consume before a serious health pro- <br /> blem might be experienced and Dr. ' Carr responded that those figures <br /> did not take into account the interaction of those contaminants with <br /> others already in - the environment of many residents. As an example, <br /> he pointed to the results of mixing cleaning fluid containing Tri- <br /> chloroethylene. (TCE) , the contaminant suspected to originate with the <br /> arsenal ,. with alcohol and its effect on the liver. The Health Officer <br /> concluded by saying he perceives most residents believe they have a <br /> right to pure, uncontaminated, drinking water. <br /> Mr. Anderlik -agreed, saying there have been systems developed in south- <br /> western states which are capable of producing safe drinking water by <br /> recycling sewage, but which the populace finds unacceptable.. He also <br /> said- his firm had contacted the company which carbon treats the water . <br /> at the arsenal and found out it would cost the City from $150 ,000 to ' <br /> $175, 0.00 to lease the system, which he noted would probably pay the cost <br /> of digging the well deeper within two years. The firm had been relu- <br /> ctant to provide the figures for purchasing the carbon treatment system <br /> he added, and the engineer reported there are no air filtering systems <br /> which have been developed to date which would be cost. effective.. <br /> Mr. Cartwright indicated he would be inclined to go along with the <br /> study recommendations but agreed to see if he could get another figure <br /> for purchasing a .carbon treatment system. <br /> Mr. Childs told those present he perceives the State Health Department <br /> would not accept the .installation of point of .use carbon filtration • <br /> systems because the City would have no control over the individual <br /> efficiencies in each home. <br /> Copies of the Mayor' s letter to our senators, representatives and other <br /> elected and appointed officials had been . distributed and when Council- <br /> man Ranallo said he would like to find out how successful New Brighton 's <br /> project had been, Mayor Sundland told him he had talked to Mayor Harcus <br /> who had indicated a willingness to share his experiences with St. Anthony <br /> officials . <br /> No decision was made that evening but staff was requested to prepare <br /> comparisons of the rate structures and time frames for the alternatives <br /> which had been discussed and to research the cost of the City buying <br /> its drinking water from Minneapolis or St. Paul, if such a purchase <br /> is possible at all, although the general consensus was that most <br /> St. Anthony residents would prefer having well water to drinking water <br /> which had come from the Mississippi River. <br /> The Council concurred with the recommendation that Well #3 be put back <br /> in operation for the summer and further consideration be given to the <br /> various options at either the Council ' s April 26th or May 10th meeting. <br /> Mr. Hamer explained that the discrepancies between the figure quoted the <br /> last meeting for painting the elevated water tower and those quoted by <br /> the engineers since that time, had resulted from the latest evaluation • <br /> of the tower' s- condition by Twin City Testing which now indicates sand <br />