My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 11171987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1987
>
PL PACKET 11171987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:36:18 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:35:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1987
SP Name
PL PACKET 11171987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 Staff <br /> 2 report: . _: C:hilds explained the modifications- in his November 2nd <br /> 3 Memorandum related to height and setback variances. , <br /> J - i <br /> 4 Krier reported on October 19th meeting between staff, <br /> 5 Gaughan representatives , Alderman Dziedzic ,and Council- <br /> 6 member Ranallo, with approximately 50 residents from the <br /> 7 immediate Minneapolis and St. Anthony area; <br /> 8 addressed all the concerns raised at that meeting which <br /> 9 he had listed in his October 29th memo, included in the <br /> 10 agenda packet; <br /> 11 suggested conditions Commissioners might want to impose <br /> 12 on a recommendation of approval of the project; but <br /> 13 urged no further delays in the project in view of volatile <br /> 14 market conditions which could affect financing. <br /> 15 Proponents: Hamel answered questions posed by two of the five <br /> 16 neighbors who were :present, as well as concerns of <br /> 17 Commissioners:. <br /> 18 . Neighbors : Jean Krajna,.. 2601 Kenzie Terrace, Apartment 311 ; who was <br /> 19 accompanied by Maribeth Baldinelli , 2338- Coolidge Street <br /> 20 N.E. , Minneapolis and -another woman who was not <br /> 21 identified. Only Ms. Krajna spoke, saying: • <br /> 22 the three had- no opposition to the proposal but were. pre- <br /> 23 sent only to find out how soon the project would replace <br /> 24 the current eyesore on the Saliterman property; <br /> 25 was told condemnation proceedings , which would take about <br /> 26 150 days , would be started as soon as the developer <br /> 27 places his financing and the H.R.A. would be able to sell <br /> 28 the property to Gaughan after that period whether a price <br /> 29 had been established with Mr. Saliterman or not. <br /> 30 Mr . Hamel said, based on how soon his company could acquire the land <br /> 31 and could get financing for the project, he anticipated construction <br /> 32 on one of the two buildings to be started early next spring, with the <br /> 33 second two months later and the entire project to be completed within <br /> 34 a year ' s time. <br /> 35 Greg Steiner and his son, 3016 Old Highway 8 , wanted to <br /> 36 know who would be operating the buildings after they were <br /> 37 completed; <br /> 38 was told Gaughan had almost always retained ownership of <br /> 39 any building he acquired and provided management for over i <br /> 40 2 , 000 rental units at this time. <br /> 2 • <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.