PL PACKET 11171987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I- In response to the 'Commission concerns -about whether the ponding area 2 would provide adequate ..drainage for the -area, . I„Ir. Childs- suggested 3 their recommendation -be made subject to the City reviewing all 4 drainage and utility plans. 5 He also . indicated a traffic engineer would be consulted within the 6 next two weeks regarding the adequacy of the access road to the 7 project off Kenzie Terrace so the siting of the pedestrian signal 8 could be finalized to meet CDBG funding deadlines. 9 10 The hearing was closed at 8 : 30 P.M. for the following motion: 11 Motion by Wagner, seconded by Werenicz to recommend to the Council 12 that the Planned Unit Development Concept and Detailed Plan, adopted 13 in November, 1986 , for the final phases of the Kenzie Terrace 14 Redevelopment Project be amended to accept the site plans dated 15 November 3 , 1987 , which were presented by the Gaughan Companies during 16 the Commission' s November 4 , 1987 hearing to include the setback* 17 variance plans and to grant a four unit per acre density variance for 18 the revised site plan which provides for 28 units per acre where the 19 Zoning Ordinance requires 24 and a 7 foot height variance to the 20 City' s Ordinance provision for buildings no higher than 35 feet, which 21 would allow the proposed structures to be a little over 42 feet high 22 from grade to roof peak. 23 The Commission further recommends that: 24 *the Council stipulate that drainage and utility features of the 25 plan be reviewed by the City before finalization; 26 *a -traffic specialist be consulted to assure adequate and safe 27 vehicle facility access to the project; 28 *the August plans dealing with basic structure exteriors and grade 29 elevations , which were not included in the Commission agenda 30 packet become a reference for final approval. 31 The Council is also recommended to adopt the following additions.: to 32 the plans : 33 *a second access for emergency vehicles through the parking lot as 34 proposed by the developers; 35 *City Ordinance prohibition of unnecessary .storage on balconies ; 36 37 *walkways from Coolidge Street and from Kenzie Terrace through the 38 project to the shopping center as proposed by the developers for:.:-' 39 the convenience of the area residents; 40 *a restriction of construction between. .7 : 00 P.M. and 7 : 00 A.M. to 41 avoid unnecessary disruption of the -neighborhood. 4