My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 12201988
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1988
>
PL PACKET 12201988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:38:46 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:38:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1988
SP Name
PL PACKET 12201988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> 1 Nr. Childs' November 9th memorandum addressing the two requests from the • <br /> 2 developers which had been reported in the Notices of Hearings and <br /> 3 explained the proposed amendments to the Development Concept .Plan and <br /> 4 Detail Plan approved in August, 1988, which, he said: <br /> 5 *allow parking around the perimeter of the site rather than in the <br /> 6 center; <br /> 7 *provide separation in parking between the individual buildings to <br /> 8 give each building more of its own identity; <br /> 9 *move the buildings away from the site perimeter which would decrease <br /> 10 the "mass" of buildings adjacent to the abutting property owners; <br /> it *add an additional driveway entrance to Kenzie Terrace on the west <br /> 12 side of the property to give separate identity to the individual <br /> 13 buildings; <br /> 14 *provide villa-type units on the ends of each building which would be <br /> 15 dropped down to two stories high with separate entrances for these units <br /> 16 designed to get away from the long hallways and to reduce overall <br /> 17 building mass on the site; <br /> 18 *provide a more efficient pathway system for the project. <br /> 19 The City Manager had suggested the Commissioners question the developers • <br /> 20 about the lessening of brick on the buildings. <br /> 21 Ms. VanderHeyden indicated staff had been very pleased with the changes <br /> 22 perceiving they were all positive and recommended adoption of the <br /> 23 Final Plan. She told Chair Wagner the only call the City had gotten in <br /> 24 response to the Notice of Hearings mailed to the neighbors had been from <br /> 25 one women who expressed disappointment that the pools weren't to be <br /> 26 inside so she could do lap swimming. <br /> 27 Design and Site Changes Emlained by Developers <br /> 28' Greg Bronk, Gene Nelson, Frank Lang of Lang/Nelson Associates, and Carl <br /> 29 Frederickson of Leonard Lampert Architects discussed the changes in the <br /> 30 project since August with the Commissioners. <br /> 31 Mr. Bronk: <br /> 32 *reiterated that his firm' had closed on the bonds in September and <br /> 33 the City had negotiated the purchase of the land with his firm's <br /> 34 acquisition anticipated sometime in December, after which demolition <br /> 35 would start and construction would get underway; <br /> 36 *explained that LaNel had consulted five different architects before <br /> 37 deciding on the villa-type structures which produce a type of multi- <br /> 38 family housing closer to a single family environment which appears to <br /> 39 be very attractive today; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.